Sunday, July 20, 2014

The Pinterest Story

English: Red Pinterest logo
English: Red Pinterest logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Pinterest came out of nowhere to overtake Twitter at a record speed. It became the fastest growing website in history. And to think it was founded by a non techie, that it was rejected by pretty much every venture capitalist in Silicon Valley, that it had a slow start, that its earliest users were in Iowa (Iowa?), that it is what it is today.

Silbermann got a job in Washington DC as a consultant. He was basically putting together spreadsheets. His girlfriend tired of his talking about wanting to do a tech startup. Finally she said, either we move to Silicon Valley, and you do it, or you stop talking about it. I will support you, she said. So they moved. Not only she gave the big nudge, but also the big idea. The image centered website was her idea. The pinboard was her idea.

But it was no easy take off. Silbermann claimed he had the WiFi password to pretty much every cafe in the Valley. He had approached every known VC around there. It was tough. Today Pinterest feels so obvious. It has the feeling of having hit the bull’s eye.

Early on the company was using an apartment because it could not afford office space. At one point Silbermann tried to sell off the company at what would today be considered a weirdly low price. But he failed to sell.

After launch, he reached out to every friend he had in the Valley hoping they would become avid users, but noone seemed to “get it.” He had to make do with his early users in Iowa. For nine months the user base was really, really low. He personally wrote to his first 5,000 users.

But those using the site were really, really engaged. That deep engagement was a good sign. Also, although the user base early on was small, it seemed to double every month. That is why there was a spike after nine months.

After Pinterest had already established itself as a successful company, Silbermann said if he were to now apply to work at the company, he probably would not be hired. That was a modest thing to say. But maybe not. Maybe he had a point. Hire people smarter than you is a mantra many successful tech entrepreneurs seem to follow.

Pinterest by now is the stuff of legend. Its success is a reward to out of the box thinking. But you also have to note, Silbermann did not invent the pinboard. He simply took it to the web. All old industries similarly are waiting virtualization. Looked at that way, it feels like recycling, rather than a bolt of genius. But the success is there for all to see.

I am a Third World Guy. A million dollars is a lot of money to me, but a billion is more. Pinterest hit billions in valuation right before my eyes. For that matter, I met the two FourSquare founders before they had raised any money. FourSquare has also approached a billion dollars in valuation. It feels to me like it happened right before my eyes. I met another early stage team a few years ago that sold for $29 million last year. It feels like it happened fast.

The web is the wild, wild west today. Software will keep eating the world, to echo the Netscape founder. There are enormous inefficiencies everywhere you look around. There is so much work to do.

Pinterest also made a major blind spot spotting in that the site was an early success among women. There was something about the image focus, and pinboarding that a lot of women seemed to have found really appealing.

I have to admit, I have still not learned to use Pinterest. I mean, I have had an account for a while. But it is more like a flag holder. I have still not figured out how to make Pinterest part of my daily life, like Twitter is. I guess it takes some practice. Maybe there are blog posts out there I need to read on how to make the best use of Pinterest.

Some women have called Pinterest their Google. It is how they find stuff on the web. Pinterest has been sending more traffic to a ton of websites than Facebook. It is a search engine to a lot of people, apparently. That is as good as it gets on the web.

Did you google it? Did you pin it? Both those questions are grammatically correct.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

What Is Madheshvad Or Madhesism?

English: A sketch of Mr. Amitab Bachchan
English: A sketch of Mr. Amitab Bachchan (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
English: Amitabh Bachchan photographed by Stud...
English: Amitabh Bachchan photographed by Studio Harcourt Paris Français : Amitabh Bachchan photographié par Studio Harcourt Paris Harcourt Paris (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
CK Lal, I have long maintained, is a world class columnist. I was just reading a thought provoking article by him in Madheshvani. He is talking about Madheshvad. Does it even exist? What is it? He starts by relaying a story of Upendra Yadav claiming at a public function that it does not exist.

Upendra Yadav was established in Nepali politics through the first Madhesi Kranti. For him to deny the existence of Madheshvad is odd. Or plain ignorant.

What is the Madhesh? It is the land gifted by the British to the then Nepali rulers. Otherwise the current Madhesh would have been part of India.

Who are the Madhesis? The Madhesis are the Indian origin people living in the Madhesh. It is a cultural, and not a geographical term. Because, by now, almost 40% of the Teraiwasis are Pahadi. Pahadi is also a cultural term. That includes those who speak Nepali as their first language. That also denotes the Janajatis from the Hills who are now settled in the Terai. The Madhesis speak Maithili (my first language), Bhojpuri, Awadhi (Amitabh Bachchan's first language), Tharu, Urdu, Hindi, Marwadi and so on. The Tharus are very much Madhesi in terms of similarities in language, culture, traditions, and political marginalization. As are the Muslims in the Terai. They are Madhesi.

What is Madheshvad? Madhesvad is the name of the political struggle that hopes to give proportionate representation to the Madhesis in the Nepali state structure. Once that goal is achieved, Madhesvad will linger on as a cultural term. It will mean enriching the Madhesi cultures. Lakhs of Madhesis have been denied citizenship cards. Making sure they get those cards is the most important goal of Madheshvad. The second most important goal is federalism. No to North-South states. Yes to East-West states. No to adding Kailali, Kanchanpur, Jhapa and Morang to the hill states. Yes to keeping all Terai districts in the Terai states. Yes to eliminating some national level ministries. Yes to downsizing the Nepal Army, which is basically a Pahadi Army. Yes to reservations for Madhesis. Yes to Madhesi police forces in the Madhesi states.

So, yes, Madhesvad does exist. That Upendra Yadav says it doesn't shows he was just surfing the wave in 2007. He did not create it.

But Madheshvad is also to do with economic development. Actually, I'd like to argue Madheshvad as an ideology is primarily to do with development. The Hulaki Rajmarg is the backbone of the Madheshvad. Taking the per capita income among Madhesis to global levels is the most important, and the ultimate goal of Madheshvad.

Madhesh: A British Gift To Nepal


Source: CK Lal's Recent Article In Madheshvani

Friday, June 20, 2014

The Meaning Of 12 Lakh Votes

English: a aerial view of field in terai in Nepal
English: a aerial view of field in terai in Nepal (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Eastern Terai -  - HT -3
Eastern Terai - - HT -3 (Photo credit: lecercle)
If the unified Madhesi party ends up with 12 lakh votes, that would mean the party is as good in the Terai in political strength as the NC and the UML might be nationally. That unified Madhesi party will be the natural party of power in the two Terai states.

Natural Allies: 10 Lakh Votes

MJF(D) 2,83,468

MJFN 2,14,319
TMLP 1,81,140
SP 1,40,930

NMSP 79,508
TMSP 65,047

MJF(R) 35,289
Federal Sadbhavana Party 25,215

These eight parties are natural allies and are candidates for becoming one party. Add to that JP Gupta's grouping. That makes it nine. The Tharu parties might be a harder nut to crack. But attempts have to be made. Bijay Gachhedar should take the lead there. If he can not even unify the Tharu parties, what good is he?

Tharuhat Tarai Party Nepal 62,526
Dalit Janajati Party 48,802
Federal Democratic National Front (Tharuhat) 21,519
Tharuhat Tarai Party Nepal 13,811

And then there are the fringe Madhesi parties.

Nepali Janata Dal 33,203
Madhesh Samata Party Nepal 23,001

12,27,778

Looks like I got the numbers wrong in the last post. Here are the revised numbers.

MJF(D)  2,83,468

MJFN    2,14,319
TMLP   1,81,140
SP         1,40,930

NMSP      79,508
TMSP      65,047

Tharuhat Tarai Party Nepal  62,526
Dalit Janajati Party               48,802
MJF(R)                               35,289
Nepali Janata Dal                 33,203
Federal Sadbhavana Party    25,215
Madhesh Samata Party Nepal   23,001
Federal Democratic National Front (Tharuhat) 21,519
Tharuhat Tarai Party Nepal 13,811

Total Votes     12,27,778

Madhesi Party Unification: 14 Parties, Not Just 3



Madhesi Parties: 12 Lakh PR Votes

It is to be noted that the Madhesi parties did not get fewer votes than in 2008. At 12 lakh votes, they seem to compete with the Maoists themselves. There was no anti-incumbency wave against the Madhesi parties. They punished themselves by being divided into 14 parties. There is no need for another Madhesi Movement. There is only a need for a unification among these 14 parties.

Election Results















MJF(D)  2,66,276
MJF, N  2,12,733
TMLP   1,80,435
SP         1,33,521
NMSP      79,264
Terai Madhesh Sadbhavana Party  64,299
Tharuhat Terai Party Nepal           62,889
Dalit Janajati Party                        47,696
Nepali Janata Dal                          33,186
MJF(R)                                        32,004
Federal Sadbhavana Party              26,463
Madhesh Samta Party Nepal          23,960
Federal Democratic National Front (Tharuhat) 21,519
Tharuhat Tarai Party Nepal           13,811

Total Votes 11,98,056