Thursday, January 15, 2009

CPN (Maoist) To CPN (Deng)?




CPN (Maoist) To CPN (Deng)

When I heard rumors recently that the Maoists of Nepal might change the name of their party, I was hoping they would become CPN (Deng Xiaoping).

Mao was a disaster in power. He was terrible for the Chinese economy. The numbers show.

The Chinese Success Story

Deng Xiaoping - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Deng never held office as the head of state or the head of government, but served as the de facto leader of the People's Republic of China from 1978 to the early 1990s. ........ instrumental in introducing a new brand of socialist thinking, having developed Socialism with Chinese characteristics and Chinese economic reform, also known as the socialist market economy and partially opened China to the global market. ..... generally credited with advancing China into becoming one of the fastest growing economies in the world and vastly raising the standard of living. .......... Deng changed China from a country obsessed with mass political movements to a country focused on economic construction. ...... China's significant economic growth in the 1980s and 1990s was largely credited to Deng's policies. ........ Deng Xiaoping's policies are among some of the most successful industrializations in human history, comparable to only the rapid industrialization of Japan, the Soviet Union and the homeplace of the industrial revolution itself, Britain. In a little over 30 years, his policies was able to move China from the peasant society it once was to an industrial superpower whose industrial output is only second to that of the United States and is said to become world leaders in the economic market in just a few decades. ...... Favouring joint-ventures over domestic industry, Deng allowed foreign capital to pour into the country. While some see these policies as a fast method to put China on par with the west, Chinese hardline communists criticize Deng for abandoning the Party's founding ideals and selling out China.
CNN In-Depth Specials - Visions of China - Profiles: Deng Xiaoping "Poverty is not socialism." He encouraged the creation of a market economy and capitalist-like enterprises, and by the early 1990s his reforms had helped lift an estimated 170 million peasants out of extreme poverty. ..... Born in 1904 to a prosperous landowner in a village 65 miles from Chongqing in the south-central province of Sichuan, Deng turned to revolutionary thought early, and his résumé as a Communist is almost as long as Mao Tse-tung's. ...... Deng's pragmatic ideas for economic development, however, often put him at odds with Chairman Mao, who emphasized egalitarian policies and revolutionary zeal. ....... Mao once complained that Deng treated him "like a dead ancestor" and later quipped, "Which emperor authorized that?" when Deng ordered the turnover of collective lands to individual peasants to help relieve the famines of 1959-62 that resulted from Mao's failed Great Leap Forward that began in 1958. ....... three political purges. Fellow revolutionaries ousted him in 1933, but he was back in good standing a year later. His 1966 fall from grace would last far longer. Responding to the famines induced by the Great Leap Forward during which an estimated 30 million people died, Deng proposed major reforms, such as free markets for farmers and incentive bonuses. In short order he was denounced as a "capitalist roader," held under house arrest for two years, paraded in a dunce cap through the streets of Beijing and forced to wait tables at a Communist Party school. ...... One of Deng's first reforms was to abolish Mao's rural agricultural communes and allow peasants to cultivate family plots. Grain harvests quickly increased ...... City dwellers were allowed to start small-scale businesses, ordinary Chinese were allowed to buy consumer goods, and Deng actively courted international investors.
TIME Magazine | 60 Years of Asian Heroes: Deng Xiaoping Deng has come to be linked to China's astonishing economic development, and to the steering of China away from its Leninist and Maoist organizational straitjacket into a wider world of technological growth and international trade. .......... the pragmatist, as the man who introduced a new economic dynamism with his striking phrase that it did not matter whether a cat was black or white as long as it could catch mice. ........ the nation's long-dormant entrepreneurial spirit had to be encouraged, not inhibited, and that the capitalist nature of some of the needed changes had to be openly accepted ......... there was the need to revamp the educational system, especially universities and research institutes; the military had to be streamlined and professionalized; lawyers had to be trained in the intricacies of commercial and corporate law, and be able to have cases heard in a viable and expanded judicial system; more Chinese had to be permitted to study overseas, and foreign students and tourists to come to China ......... Leading China down the capitalist path, Deng relaxed all manner of economic controls and launched Special Economic Zones—free-trade enclaves that demonstrated the prosperous potential of a liberalized economy. These initiatives helped transport millions of Chinese out of poverty in the space of just a few decades, a feat unprecedented in history; transformed China into the global manufacturing behemoth that it now is; and heralded the country's arrival on the world stage as a major geopolitical and financial player. ........ Deng could never forget that it was a Maoist vision, however flawed and ruthless, that had helped unite China after its decades of fragmentation. Mao might have pulled the nation together, but it was Deng who pushed it toward prosperity and modernity, and a future as one of the world's great powers.

Switzerland

There is also a lot of talk of Switzerland, as in Nepal should get itself a constitution like that of Switzerland. I find the direct democracy models of Switzerland not too practical for Nepal. We have a hard enough time holding free and fair elections. The low literacy rate will complicate the process further.

Politics of Switzerland - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia the closest state in the world to a direct democracy. ...... The Swiss executive is one of the most stable governments worldwide. ...... Switzerland has a rich party landscape. ..... judges elected for six-year terms by the Federal Assembly ....... Although it has a diverse society, Switzerland has a stable government. ...... among the least corrupt nations. ....... Together with seven other European nations, Switzerland leads the 2005 index on Freedom of the Press ....... The energy generated in Switzerland comprises 55.2% hydroelectricity, 39.9% from nuclear power
Demographics of Switzerland Switzerland consistently ranks high on quality of life indices, including per capita income, concentration of computer and internet usage per capita, insurance coverage per individual, and health care rates. ....... 2007 7,593,500 ...... Total population was projected to stagnate in 2036 at around 8.1 million
Switzerland's Political System: Decentralisation, Federalism and..


I am all about learning from the Chinese success story. But just like Deng did not stop at Mao's teachings, the Nepali Maoists need to have the guts to go beyond Deng himself. Deng teaches good stuff on the economy. But he fails on the political front. The Nepali Maoists have the option to embrace political pluralism in an ideological way.

The Maoists did win an election. And I do intend to respect the people's verdict. They did so well electorally in Kathmandu Valley. I don't feel they bulleyed the people in the valley into voting for them.

The two biggest winners of the April 10 elections have been the Maoists and the MJF, neither of which had much of a presence in the 1990s. That shows the Nepali people were looking for new faces, new parties. The Congress and the UML got punished for their old thinking, old ways.

Law And Order

There can be no strong economy without basic law and order.

10,000 MW In 10 Years

That goal can not be achieved if the Maoists keep scaring away the foreign investors like they have. The economy losing 70,000 industrial jobs due to bad behavior by the Maoist trade unions is not how you lead the economy.

Peace Talks And The Terai

The armed Madhesi groups are a symptom that if you integrate the Royal Army, and the Maoist Army, you end up with a Pahadi Army.

What Shape Federalism?

That is where the primary contention is going to be in the constitution making process.

Transition Challenges

Who Killed Journalist Uma Singh?


A minister out of reins
- UMA SINGH

One of the influential leaders of Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) (now Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)) Matrika Yadav always draws attention once he joins the government -- sometimes by seizing red sandalwood, and at other times by locking Local Development Officer in toilet. Most recently, his seizure of land belonging to Birendra Sah, an ordinary citizen at Mirchaiya, Siraha district, has become a topic of hot discussion. In his effort to prove that he is different from the others, Yadav has come to believe that he is above the law, which is his illusion.

His relationship with his party and the party's Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal has soured over his act of seizing a citizen's land. He had to resign even from the cabinet after his party asked him to apologize on behalf of the party over the case. After being relieved from his ministerial responsibilities, Yadav is busy participating in programs organized by his party's sister organization, Madhesi National Liberation Front, in various parts of Siraha and Sarlahi districts.

The then Minister for Land Reform and Management Matrika Yadav seized the land belonging to 75 locals including Sah with the help of Young Communist League cadres on September 14, 2008. He has distributed 11 bigahas of land and a house with 16 rooms to his party's 200 dalit activists as part of his campaign to nationalize the property of former royal family members. He has alleged that the land actually belongs to former King Gyanendra's brother-in-law Mohan Shahi.

Yadav has ordered local dalits and squatters of Malhaniya, Raghopur, Kuthanama, Jiwa, Mirchaiya, Matiyawa, Rampur, Birta and Prayagpur to build huts and settle over the seized land.

The land seizure was initially done by Maoist cadres led by the party's district in-charge and Matrika's own son-in-law Dilip Sah, Constituent Assembly member Mahendra Paswan and local Maoist leader Jagat Yadav on August 30.

The land was freed under the directives of Home Minister Bam Dev Gautam. But the land was captured again under direct orders from the then Minister Yadav in less than 24 hours.

"Home Minister interfered in my jurisdiction without informing me," Yadav had said. "I went there to help them [dalits] settle as before. What I have done is hundred percent right."
During the people's war, Maoist activists used to run a people's court in the house spread in a 25-kattha area. Madhesi People's Rights Forum (MPRF) activists had chased away the Maoist cadres from the house during Madhes movement.

Money scam

It was revealed that financial dealing was the main reason behind the Maoist cadres' seizure of the 11 bigahas of land and the house at Ramnagar Mirchaiya-3. One of the victims, Birendra Sah, has claimed that the property was seized as he failed to pay donation as demanded by the Maoists. Sah has claimed that he has already given Rs 4 million including a bank check worth Rs 1 million and Rs 3 million in cash in donation to the Maoists.

Sah has claimed that he paid Rs 700,000 to Maoist Constituent Assembly member elected from Siraha-5, Mahendra Paswan, Rs 1.8 million to Siraha district in-charge Dilip Sah, Rs 1 million worth check to former district in-charge Surya Nath Yadav and Rs 500,000 to former district secretary and district coordinator of a Maoist sister organization Abinash. He claimed that Maoists were demanding additional Rs 1 million and that the land was seized as he failed to pay the amount.

The former Maoist district secretary Abinash has confirmed that Birendra Sah of Kalyanpur VDC-6 had provided a total of Rs 4 million as donation to the party. Secretary Abinash has revealed that the amount was taken by the party activists as per the internal understanding that they would pay back the amount to the party.

Such activities on the part of former Minister Yadav have already crossed all limits. The public is asking the question whether Matrika who gained little knowledge of parliamentary affairs even after assuming the portfolio of a minister has any mental problem.

Yadav's latest act of seizing land has strained his relationship with Home Minister Bam Dev Gautam, who represents CPN-UML in the cabinet. The Maoist leadership is also saying that it would take action against Yadav. These activities of moody and eccentric Yadav have dealt a blow to the politics of consensus.

1,200 bigahas of land seized by Maoists in Siraha

The Maoist have not returned the seized land in Siraha district even three months after Maoist chairman and Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal directed his party cadres to do so. Some 1,200 bigahas of land captured during the People's War is still under Maoist control.

The 12-point understanding between the then Seven Party Alliance and the Maoists on November 22, 2005, has stated that the seized land and houses would be returned to their rightful owners. Likewise, the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) between the government and the Maoists on November 21, 2006 also pledges return of seized land and property and creation of conducive environment to help the displaced return to their respective villages. Above all, the agreement also states that a committee comprising government and Maoist members would be formed for the purpose.

But the committee has not taken shape yet due to political bickering among major parties, says a Chief District Officer. Though the 25-point Code of Conduct developed after the first round of negotiations between the government and the Maoists last June clearly states that the displaced should be able to return to their villages and receive their properties seized during the insurgency, this has not been implemented in the case of displaced people in Siraha district.

During the insurgency, 225 people were displaced from the district. According to Informal Sector Service Center (Insec) Representative Devraj Pokharel, Maoists seized land belonging to 80 families here during the insurgency period. The Maoists did not take the process of returning the seized land and houses to their rightful owners to a logical end, Pokharel said. Likewise, the people displaced due to several other armed groups are not able to return to their villages either, he added.

According to Ram Chandra Gupta, vice chairman of Human Rights Organization Siraha, though Maoist cadres have not returned property belonging to commoners, they returned all the land at Karjanha VDC belonging to Russia-based renowned Non-Resident Nepali Industrialist Upendra Mahato on the condition that Mahato would provide a big amount of money as donation to the Maoist party.

During the insurgency period, Maoist cadres seized 89 bigahas of land belonging to Upendraman Prajapati's family of Mahadev Portaha, 125 bigahas of land of Satyanarayan Shrestha of Madar, 300 bigahas belonging to Manoj Shrestha from Arnamapipra, 25 bigahas belonging to Mahendra Yadav from Siraha and 125 bigahas of land belonging to former District Development Committee President Umesh Chandra Das.

Likewise, they seized 81 bigahas belonging to Lava Bikram of Sirloha Pachhwari VDC, and 40 bigahas of Laxmi Bahadur Niraula. Similarly, they seized 80 bigahas of land at Nahara Nigoul VDC-4 from Chaturbhuj Singh of Rajbiraj, 85 bigahas of land belonging to Krishna Chandra Jha of Arnama Bangthiya, 60 bigahas at Bariyarpatti belonging to Kiran Pradhananga, six bigahas belonging to the sons of renowned poet late Siddhicharan Shreshta, garden spread in seven bigahas of land belonging to Nepali Congress Siraha district President Sita Devi Yadav and other 30 bigahas of land belonging to Sita Devi's family.

But, the information availed by the District Police Office Siraha shows that Maoists have seized only 374 bigahas of land. Maoist Coordinator in Siraha, Dilip Sah, claimed the Maoist party has so far not issued any instruction regarding returning the seized land to the rightful owners. Sah claimed that the seized land would be returned only after the government forms a Land Reforms Commission.

(This article written by Uma Singh was published in the October 2008 edition of Nepali Sarokar monthly, and reproduced on Tuesday by our sister news portal in Nepali, dainikee.com. Uma was murdered at her residence in Janakpur on Sunday.)



BBC News
Thousands mourn Nepal journalist
BBC News, UK - Jan 13, 2009
By Charles Haviland Thousands of people have joined the funeral procession of Uma Singh, the Nepali journalist murdered in the southern city of Janakpur on ...
Singh's murder might be politically motivated: FNJ Kantipur Online
Uma Singh killed to exact revenge: FNJ Himalayan Times
Rights activist stabbed to death in Nepal AsiaOne
CNN - Nepalnews.com
all 164 news articles »
EU urges govt to probe into murder of scribe Singh at earliest
Kantipur Online, Nepal - Jan 13, 2009
... (EU) Missions in Kathmandu, Wednesday urged the government to probe into the incident and bring the guilty in the murder of scribe Uma Singh to book. ...
Minister Mahara leaving for Janakpur to inquire journo murder
Kantipur Online, Nepal - 6 hours ago
KATHMANDU, Jan 15 - Four days after Dhanusha-based journalist Uma Singh was brutally murdered, a team led by Minister for Information and Communications ...

Nepalnews.com
PM postpones Europe visit
Kantipur Online, Nepal - 8 hours ago
"I would like to thank you all for the concern shown against the killing of journalist Uma Singh, the incident has shocked the government as well," he said. ...
Scribe’s murder forces Nepal PM to cancel junket Thaindian.com
all 36 news articles »
Unidentified group kills Dhanusa based journalist Singh
Kantipur Online, Nepal - Jan 11, 2009
DHANUSA, Jan 12 - Dhanusa based journalist Uma Singh who was attacked and injured by an unidentified group died on Sunday night. Singh was attacked by a ...
Meanwhile, an unidentified group has threatened to kill Kantipur's ... E Kantipur
all 2 news articles »

findingDulcinea
Murders in Nepal, Sri Lanka Underscore Dangers for Journalists in Asia
findingDulcinea, New York - 4 hours ago
The United Nations is urging Nepal’s government to protect the media, after Uma Singh, a reporter with Radio Today FM and a member of the Women’s Human ...
Schoolboy gets himself abducted, lands in police dragnet
Times of India, India - 19 hours ago
Manuraj (17), a student of class 11 in Bhupat Singh College in Manaknagar in the city, went missing from his house on January 9 evening. ...
A minister out of reins
Republica, Nepal, Nepal - Jan 14, 2009
(This article written by Uma Singh was published in the October 2008 edition of Nepali Sarokar monthly, and reproduced on Tuesday by our sister news portal ...
MP: Supporters want Prahlad Patel to rejoin BJP
Times of India, India - Jan 12, 2009
A delegation of his supporters soon will call on Madhya Pradesh chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan and state unit BJP president Narendra Singh Tomar to ...
Prahlad parts ways with Uma Zee News
Prahlad Patel likely to return to BJP India Today
all 3 news articles »
Legislature-parliament kicks off, TMDP boycotts session
E Kantipur, Nepal - Jan 13, 2009
... will not allow the legislative session move on if the home minister fails to furnish answers on the murder of Dhanusha-based journalist Uma Singh. ...


Journalist Singh’s murderers won’t be spared: PM Dahal Dahal who is also the Maoist Chairman, however, said that even the Maoist cadres will be punished if found guilty, FNJ Secretary Ramji Dahal informed...... the FNJ noted that journalist Singh was murdered in a pre-planned manner. In a preliminary investigation report, the FNJ said political and family reasons could be behind Singh’s murder stressing that the case should be linked with the abduction of her father and brother allegedly by the Maoists. ... Journalist Singh was murdered on Sunday night by an unidentified group of 20 men. Even after five days, no arrests have been made so far.
Minister Mahara in Janakpur to inquire Singh murder “I am here as the prime minister was busy,” said he. .... FNJ President Dharmendra Jha also arrived here with the Communications Minister. ..... An unidentified group of about 20 men had brutally stabbed Singh with Khukuris on Sunday night.
Nationwide protests on against journo murder The journalists are set to intensify the protests as the police have been unable to arrest those involved in Singh's murder even after five days. The agitating journalists have decided to stop the works at the entire government and non government offices from tomorrow.

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Madhesi Movement: Next Phase



The three major Madhesi parties are in a resurgent mood. The internal wrangling inside the MJF is not the murmur before a split, that is the murmur before a new, heightened sense of unity and mission. The TMLP is in a major growth phase. Now that the Congress cadres in the Terai know that the best days of the Congress in the Terai are in the past, they are thronging to the TMLP in large numbers. The Congress no longer feels like the elephant in the room in the Terai. It is on its way to what happened to the Congress in India in Bihar and Utter Pradesh. A once mighty party ended up with a token presence in both those states.

There are those who are unhappy that former Congress leaders like Jaya Prakash Gupta, Bijay Gachhedar, Renu Yadav, and Sharad Singh Bhandari have kind of taken over the party. They need to understand that the MJF's primary tussle in the Terai for the April 10 elections was with the Congress, and so the MJF did what the TMLP tried to do, but did not succeed. Both parties tried their very best to win away Congress leaders, cadres and voters from the Congress. The MJF succeeded, but the TMLP only mildly succeeded. But then I expect the TMLP to do much better in the next parliamentary elections which will likely take place in less than two years from now.

That there are three or four Madhesi parties is not bad news. There will be competition and the people will benefit. That is how democracy works. I never felt bad that there are more than one Madhesi party in the ring. The more the merrier. The Madhesi people do not need to depend on any one party to fulfill their aspirations. If the Madhesi people feel the MJF is not being true to the cause, they might flock to the TMLP and the Sadbhavana, and vice versa. And that is good news. That is the beauty of democracy.

The demand of One Terai, One Province is a demand for geographic federalism. 40% of the people in the Terai districts are non-Madhesi. I think the Madhesi leaders should stop calling it One Madhesh, One Pradesh, instead they should say one Terai, one Pradesh. Madhesh denotes one cultural group, namely the Madheshi, Terai denotes all those living in the Terai, Madhesi, Tharu, Pahadi, Janajati.

Four geographical states of roughly equal areas might be a good idea for federalism in Nepal. I have been emphasizing that we retain the 75 districts.





In The News

Nepal's Terai-based alliance warn of stir Zee News, India Rajendra Mahato, Minister for Commerce and Supplies, underlined that the Madhesis demands, including greater representation in the state structure, were still to be fulfilled.
India provoking civil war in Nepal Terai: Maoist leader Telegraphnepal.com, Nepal “Our Prime Minister is not serious over the issues of nationalism, he turned out to become the prime minister of just only of the Pahadiya Community.” ..... “The Prime Minister is not at all serious about the Madhesi issues”. ..... “If Madhesi issues are not addressed properly, the split of Nepal as a nation state is inevitable”, said Mr. Yadav.
MJF internal wrangling delays House session, cabinet meeting Nepalnews.com, Nepal The MJF called the parliamentary party meeting to resolve the internal dispute after two thirds of its CA members submitted a memorandum to the Prime Minister asking him to relieve all four MJF ministers from the cabinet.
MJF parliamentary meet underway Kantipur Online The group led by lawmaker BP Yadav
Matrika threatens to leave Maoist party if Madhesis betrayed Nepalnews.com, Nepal
Nepal: MJF will not divide, FM Yadav Telegraphnepal.com
YCL, YF Derailing Peace Process: Yadav Himalayan Times
YCL, YF must be dissolved: FM Yadav Kantipur Online
MJF will quit govt if Koshi dam problems not addressed: FM Yadav Kantipur Online
FM Yadav threatens to quit Nepal government Telegraphnepal.com
TMLP announces protest programmes
Nepalnews.com, Nepal
TMLP publicises struggle programmes Kantipur Online
TMLP withdraws support to govt Nepalnews.com
TMLP to announce agitation on Saturday Nepalnews.com
Mulayam meets Nepal president
SINDH TODAY, Pakistan
Integrate our cadres into security agencies: Madhesi Virus Killers Kantipur Online, Nepal
Nepal: Madhesi Forum in a fight to finish Telegraphnepal.com, Nepal Bijay Kumar Gachhadar who has come under fire from party cadres for his statement against ‘One Madhes, One Pradesh’ said his party stood by the slogan.
Gachhadar lambasts Upendra Yadav Himalayan Times
Single Madhes province is MJF’s ideal, says Yadav Nepalnews.com
Conflict growing within MJF Kantipur OnlineGachchedhar has hinted that the increasing differences within the party could eventually lead to its split. He said, "People close to Yadav have sponsored provocation against my remarks in different districts and also tried to burn my effigy." ..... Saying that chairman Yadav is running the party on communist tyrannical ideology, he informed, "We are now campaigning against one-leadership system and campaigning for group-leadership."

राजेन्द्र महतोसंग-04.01.09
मधेशी दल, सरकारबीचको अविश्वास-03.01.09
कुन्द दीक्षितसंग-24.12.08
मोहन वैद्य किरणसंग-26.11.08
प्रेसमाथि प्रहार वा मजदुरलाई मार-27.12.08



Saturday, December 27, 2008

The Maoist Attack On Himal





Personal Angle


Ashutosh Tiwari has been a personal and cherised friend of mine for a decade and a half now. I cherish our first meeting in Kathmandu in the mid-90s when he was home for vacation from Harvard, and I was someone applying to colleges in America. Curiously all of our subsequent interactions have been online, but that does not make the bond any less strong. Prashant Jha and I have never met, but we chat online like friends. I have admired CK Lal over time. And it gives me pride he knows of me. I have met Kunda and Kanak in New York City, although for some reason I connected more with Kanak than Kunda. I embarrassed Kiran Nepal during his NYC trip by video interviewing him for so long over a few days. You have turned me into a celebrity, he complained. Kashish Das Shrestha has had a small time affiliation with the Himal brand name. So if I have not jumped all over this act of Maoist atrocity, it is because I have had some urgent engagements locally, personally. Believe it or not, this is the first time I have read these Nepali Times articles below.

Sharp divide Nepali Times
The boundaries of federalism
"It will backfire"
(Blank Editorial)
High noon at Himal
Dahal in the dock
They do it again

This attack is outrageous, but not surprising.

Wet Dream

The idea that the Maoists will turn Nepal into a one party communist republic is a wet dream. It is not going to happen. Dahal talks of a transitional republic. I also think Nepal currently is a transitional republic. It will continue so as long as it does not have a firm constitution. Kiran talks of a people's republic. He should go ahead and talk of a one party communist republic if that is what he means by that. Otherwise the term people's republic is vague, perhaps intentionally so. Who in Nepal today is for a royal Republic, or a Hindu republic, or a republic of the landed, or a republic of the moneyed? Of course we are for a people's republic. My idea of a people's republic is a one person one vote republic. What is Kiran's idea? I would like to know.

The Nepali people just got rid of a Gyanendra Shaha dictatorship, and the dude had roots going back hundreds of years, a 100,000 strong army personally loyal to him. Who is Pushpa Kamal Dahal? Who is Kiran Baidya?

Fire, Water

Dahal keeps suggesting he can have both fire and water. You can not be both for a multi-party democracy and a one party dictatorship. You can not be both for a free press and violent attacks on journalists. You can not be both mafia and political party. What we have in Nepal right now is the Communist Party of Nepal (Mafia). The Chinese complained the Nepali Maoists were defaming their Great Leader, so they became CPN (Mafia).

CPN (Mafia), Money-Muscle

The Maoists said they were having doubts about the fundamental Maoist dictum that power flows from the barrel of a gun, so we entered into an alliance with them to throw the monarchy. But now in power they act like power flows from biceps and triceps. In the Indian shanty towns the goondas collect hafta, or weekly payments from small business owners, vendors, street hawkers. That is the mafia way. The Maoists in Nepal do the same thing. They have come up with a cocktail of a nationwide organization, a climate of fear, and the power-flows-from-biceps-and-triceps dictum to the point that the CPN (Mafia) is basically a money machine. It is not Pushpa Kamal Dahal, it is Pushpa Kamal Corleone.

It Is About The Money

Like some wise man said a long time ago, follow the money, it is always about the money. What the Maoists want is to assemble truckloads of money, from the state coffers, from private businesses. Considering they claim to be a communist party, their appetite for money seems to be limitless and healthy: that is strange. They have not shown any talent for creation or democratic distribution of wealth, but they have shown a limitless capacity for looting and lavishly spending wealth. That is not political party behavior, that is Mafia behavior.

It is ridiculous that they wish to establish a one party communist republic with money looted mafia style. That will bring forth not a one party communist republic but rather a one party criminal republic.

Damage

The Maoist dream of a one party communist republic will never be realized. Nepal will see renewed civil war before it will see a one party communist republic. Nepal will see a revived monarchy before it will see a one party communist republic. But the Maoists might do a lot of damage while trying. They will fail but after having done a lot of damage. So making sure Nepal does not turn into a one party communist republic is not enough. That is pretty much guaranteed. Nepal is not going to become one. The real challenge is to not allow the Maoists to try, not let the Maoists to do damage while trying.

Solution: Rule Of Law, Power Of Law

The most important thing to do is for the parliament to pass a law that makes it mandatory for all political parties to make and keep their finances public. That of course would apply to all the affiliated organizations as well. The non Maoists have enough votes to be able to pass this law.

Then pass a law saying organizations engaging in violent activities can be sued out of existence. Organizations engaging in extortions can be tried in a court of law. Then try organizations like the YCL, even the YF, and the Maoist sister organizations that routinely engage in violence and threats of violence.

Are there political leaders willing to pass these laws? It is not going to be easy to pass and apply these laws. The Maoists are going to want to intimidate all sorts of actors to the process. That is one thing they know to do. Such threats and intimidations can be nonviolently countered, as long there is the political consciousness to stay alert, to expose, to stay united for the common purpose of basic rule of law.

Freedom of association and assembly do not apply to groups willing to engage in violence. It is possible to sue YCL like organizations out of existence. We do not depend on the mercy of the Maoist leadership to dismantle the YCL. A judge can order it to dismantle.

The rule of law, power of law also applies to Maoists. The Maoists have every right to be for workers' rights. But those rights can't be enforced through mafia threats of force. They should pass labor friendly laws in the parliament, and get the state to implement those laws.

The Old Ways Of The Nepali Congress And The UML

The Congress and the UML keep wanting to go back to the 1990s. The idea never was to turn the Nepali Maoists into just another political party in a system like we had in the 1990s minus the monarchy. The Maoists and the non-Maoists represent the two main streams of global politics in the past century. Fusion of the two is the only way to move forward. If the non-Maoists are going to keep pushing to turn Nepal into like it was in the 1990s, the Maoists are going to keep pushing to turn Nepal into what China was like in the 1950s.

The Congress, the UML, the MJF, the TMLP, the Sadbhavana and all the rest of them are going to have to come around to saying they are for turning Nepal into a multi-party democracy of state-funded parties. They should come out for it first. And if the Maoists do not also come for the same, they should get together and topple the Maoist-led government.

You Don't Dig Heels, You Triangulate

As long the Congress and the UML will stay in the habit of digging heels wanting their old ways, the Maoists will stay lost in fundamental ideological confusion. The country will suffer.

Transition Challenges

In The News

Sharp divide Nepali Times
The boundaries of federalism
"It will backfire"
(Blank Editorial)
High noon at Himal
Dahal in the dock
They do it again





Sunday, December 07, 2008

Transition Challenges


Law And Order

Hisila Yami's call to dissolve the Maoists' YCL and the UML's Youth Force is a responsible one. Law and order is a function of the state. It is for the Nepal Police to take care of law and order. A youth wing of a political party may not engage in law and order activities. The YCL and the YF have been a fundamental threat to any feeling of normalcy in the country.

Army Integration Or Army Formation?

The phrase army integration is highly problematic. If you add the 30,000 Maoist soldiers to the 90,000 of the Nepal Army, you end up with an army that is four times the size it ought to be, and you don't end up with a Nepal Army but rather a Bahun Chhetri Janajati Army, you end up excluding the Madhesis.

The talk should not be of army integration, but rather army formation. The parliament has to prepare the blueprint for the future Nepal Army. What should be its size? What should be its ethnic composition? Its gender composition? What should be the basic criteria that the recruits should meet? The parliament has to answer those questions. Then it has to face the fact that many members of both the Nepal Army and the Maoist Army are not going to end up in the future army, just like most US soldiers who came back home from World War II did not end up in the US Army, instead many went to college, many got retrained for private sector jobs.

I recommend an army size of 20,000, and its ethnic composition has to be similar to that of the constituent assembly, and it has to be 40% female. Some of those 20,000 will come from the Nepal Army, some from the Maoist Army, some from Jwala and Goit.

So instead of debating the topic of army integration, the Maoists and the Congress should be talking army formation. The biggest challenge of that is going to moving about 100,000 soldiers into private sector jobs.

Federalism

That is going to be yet another sticky issue. There also the leaders are choosing the wrong starting point. I recommend not starting with the map. Instead tackle other aspects of federalism first.

Federalism, yes or no? Answer: yes. Should we retain the 75 districts or not? I highly recommend a yes. If you get rid of the 75 districts, then you are going to invite administrative chaos in the short term. So if you keep the 75 districts, the next question is going to be, do you want ethnic federalism or geographic federalism? I recommend a three state geographic federalism, Koshi, Karnali, and Terai with three capitals Kathmandu, Pokhara, and Narayanghat. Any attempt at ethnic federalism is likely to be endlessly contentious.

Then there is the question of power distribution. What is that going to look like at the federal level? I recommend a lower house of 75 multi member constituencies of about 245 members, every third name on a party's list must be female, including the first. (Meeting Ground Between Congress And Maoists: 75 Multi Member Constituencies) For the upper house, the entire country is going to be one constituency. It would be a fully proportional election for 100 seats. Every other name on a party's list must be female. That for the legislative.

As for the executive, I recommend a directly elected president, with one person allowed a maximum of two four year terms. Briefly I thought a prime ministerial system might work in Nepal because there are bound to be many parties in existence, and no party might ever get more than 30% of the votes. But since a coalition government is also led by one person, why not encourage parties to build coalitions before the election instead and settle on a common choice, or two or three for president. A candidate must get at least 50% of the votes or there would be a runoff. And this is not the American system, because America does not have a directly elected president.

A directly elected president will allow for stability, direct democracy, and a clear separation of powers between the legislative and the executive.

Multi-Party Democracy Of State Funded Parties

This is what we have to do to make sure we get the Maoists to stop talking about a transitional republic and the people's republic. The state will fund the parties based on how many votes they earn in the parliamentary elections. And all book keeping by the parties will have to be transparent. The parties would not be allowed any other source of fundraising. I am surprised not even the Maoists have picked up this idea. This idea would make Nepal a democracy ahead of India, Britain, and America, as close to classlessness as a democracy can get, and it will retain the multi-party nature of democracy.

If we can end up with a multi-party democracy of state funded parties, and a parliament that is at least 40% female by law, the three mass movements of April 2006, January February 2007, and February 2008 will have been the French Revolution for this 21st century. Over time China and India and others will be forced to imitate Nepal.

In The News

Oli opposes army integration NepalNews
We are no fascists, says PM Dahal
Koirala urges for unity among democratic forces
Maoists to adopt ‘drastically different democracy’
A Maoist minister sees the need to dissolve YCL and Youth Force
Maoist, UML mend fences
Girija Prasad Koirala hospitalised after suffering from a bout of pneumonia
PM Dahal says NC reluctant to promote "politics of consensus"

PM discusses coalition strategy with UML gen secy NepalNews
Political committee announced, Gurung named acting chief UML will be represented by Nepal and Surendra Pandey, CPN (Maoist) by Gurung and Barsha Man Pun, Madhesi Janadhikar Forum by Upendra Yadav and Sarat Singh Bhandari, Sadbhawana Party by Laxman Lal Karna and Ram Naresh Raya, Janamorcha by Lila Mani Pokhrel and Girijaraj Mani Pokhrel and CPN (United) by Chandra Dev Joshi.
Govt forms panel to study its hydropower ambition the prospects of generating 10,000 MW power in ten years...... eradicate illiteracy within two years. The programme will take off on December 16
After China, it's US turn to send high-level delegation to Nepal
Dr Yadav attends Kirat religious ceremony
Top cop admits political intervention in police force is real the quasi-policing activities of youth groups of political parties like the Young Communist League of CPN-Maoist and CPN-UML's Youth Force
Terai armed group declares 'ceasefire' for talks
Folk singer Ram Thapa dies
'No one has moral authority to ask for return of seized property'
Terai armed group burns down passenger bus, one dead
Ruling coalition fails to court NC into special committee












Monday, December 01, 2008

Contents 2008

Prachanda: Video
The Maoist Attack On Himal
Transition Challenges
Claiming Relevance
Simple Majority Government, Ceremonial President Ramraja
Another Seven Party Government?
तराईमा मधेस र थारुवान गरी दुई राज्य हुन सक्छन
Are The Maoists Anti-Madhesi?
Non Maoist Government Possible, All Party Government Advisable
Coalition Government, But Which Coalition Partners
All Party Government, Prachanda President, Chitralekha Speaker
Madhesi Movement: Next Moves
Nobel Peace Prize 2008: Making A Case For Nepal
Prachanda Gets To Be Nepal's First President
Permutations And Combinations
ICG: Nepal's Election And Beyond
मधेसी पार्टीले सीट तालमेल नगरेको राम्रै हो
मधेशी पार्टीले तराईका दिलत र मिहलालाई िचनेनन्
पाँच बुँदा, पाँच चुनाव
मधेसी मोर्चालाई सत्तामा पुर्याउने तिरका
मधेसी अान्दोलनले अब चुनाव िजतेर देखाउनुप्रछ
िगिरजा नेपाललाई स्री लंका बनाउन चाहन्छ
Compromise हुन सक्छ
िगिरजाले संघीय सरकार के हो भन्ने कुरा नबुझेको हुनुपर्छ
माअोवादीको गणतन्त्रको माग जस्तै हो मधेस राज्यको माग
अान्दोलन िक िनर्वाचन: मधेसी र जनजाित पार्टीहरूको एकीकरणको सवाल
मधेसी जनजाित अान्दोलनकालािग दलीय पुर्ण समानुपाितक िनर्वाचनको अावश्यकता
ICG: Nepal: Peace Postponed

Contents 2007
Contents 2006 (2)
Contents 2006
Contents 2005
Audio Video Archive