Saturday, April 29, 2006

To: The Kathmandu Media


Hamro Nepal
April 29, 2006 (sent to The Himalayan Times)

I am the only Nepali person in the diaspora I know of who has been doing Nepal work full time - more than full time - for almost a year now. Even before that I was giving it a whole lot of time right after 2/1. And so I keep getting suggestions that I should go to Nepal to enter politics. I think that suggestion does not take into account the two megatrends of the contemporary world: globalization and the internet.

Instead of going back to Nepal, I have invented an organization: Hamro Nepal. The name has a definite ethnic flavor, like Taco Bell, and was coined by the founding Vice President Anil Shahi.

Hamro Nepal has been talked about for months. It has been taking shape. Finally it was launched on the D Day of the April Revolution, when the people were going to gather around Ring Road and march onto Narayanhiti. It is an organization committed to a Democratic Republic. We believe the revolution is very much on, and we hope to see it through. Money, message and organization: those are the three tools of power in a democratic setup. We hope to marshall all three to the cause.

The organization hopes to achieve the goal of a republic, and then it hopes to contribute to rapid economic growth. Other than that, it also hopes to earn voting rights for Nepalis in America. Blacks earned it half a century ago. Nepalis don't even realize they don't have it. It is not true Nepalis in America are ahead of the Nepalis in Nepal.

We hope to grow the organization in as many countries as possible. Each country chapter will be locally registered and autonomous. The goal is to politically empower the members and Nepalis in general. The organization will also work to expand and reach out and forge a stronger Desi, and a newly coined blac identity, Black Latino Asian Caucus, to inject some much needed pride and dignity among the non-whites of America and Europe. The April Revolution just might have launched the Asian Century. The revolution's reverberations are already being felt in New York City. It has been a novel experiment in non-violence.

Hamro Nepal has been hailed in the blogosphere as the "world's first digital democracy organization." Lofty as the goals are, the real innovation Hamro Nepal is offering is in the way it is set to be organized. I would like to believe it is cutting edge.

At the core of the organization is to be a virtual parliament. The organization hopes to cultivate a culture of transparency, democracy, egalitarianism, empowerment and efficiency. Elections are to be held for the five Officer positions each year, online. There is face time, there is screen time, and there are bridge activists, members who connect the offline members to the organization's online interface and vice versa.

I expect the organization to grow at a rapid pace, and I expect its culture to become infectious. Hamro Nepal might be a much needed antidote to the racism prevalent in the west, as much as it might end up the most effective bridge among the Nepalis worldwide.


Going Forward
April 29, 2006 (sent to The Kathmandu Post)

The April Revolution of Nepal will go down in world history as the first major revolution of the 21st century. Nothing like this has happened in recenty memory in any country. Not in Eastern Europe, not nowhere. It was like the entire country poured out into the streets for 19 days. The entire country was shut down. People were out literally in all towns, all villages, all cities, people from all walks of life. The people surprised the seven party alliance, the Maoists, the king, and the world. The people surprised themselves.

House revival was a political decision. There is no particular provision in the 1990 constitution that would have allowed for House revival. And thus this paves way for the next few political decisions all the way to an unconditional constituent assembly.

But challenges lie ahead. The Maoists are still an armed group. The seven parties are still unclear on many specifics. If the spirit of the revolution is to be respected, all seven parties need to formally adopt the concept of a federal republic. So far the parties have been saying on the monarchy that it is for the people to decide, and that is skirting responsibility. Each party is going to have to take a formal stand on the monarchy. The two Congress factions, the Sadbhavana are going to have to come out and say if they are for a republic or not. The UML, the Maoists and the Jana Morcha are formally for a democratic republic. The other parties need to follow suit. And if not, if they are going to come out for a ceremonial monarchy, I believe that is going to cost them a lot of votes.

Looks like the two Congress factions will stay separate, and that is not a bad thing at all. It will be healthy for democracy to have four large parties - the two Congress factions, the UML, and the Maoists - and three small ones: the RPP, the Jana Morcha and the Sadbhavana. Like in India, we might be about to enter an era of coalition governments, and that can work beautifully. A united Congress was too much bigger than the UML in the parliament, and there was not enough healthy competition for power.

I believe the April Revolution has given Nepal an opportunity to shoot for a cutting edge democracy such that the April Revolution can stand in the same league as the October Revolution in Russia, the French Revolution, the American Revolution, and the Indian Struggle For Independence. But whether or not we will qualify will depend on if or not we can give an original twist to the concept of democracy in our next constitution. I think we should shoot for a democracy where parties do not get to raise funds, instead they get state funds in direct proportion to the number of votes they earn, and they keep all their book keeping online.

The people have barely earned the right to free speech, the right to peaceful assembly. Now they need to use it. The Madhesi community comes to mind. Madhesis in all towns and all villages and in all parties need to organize and march for a federal republic, for language rights, for one person one vote democracy. The same might apply to other marginalized groups like the Dalit, the Janajati, and the Mahila. All four groups qualify for reserved seats in the parliament. The pressure has to be maintained or the political party leaders might go slack.

But the key issue still is Maoist disarmament. I propose that we dismantle both armies. Nepal does not need an army. We are not about to go to war with China or India. We need to be spending on education, health and micro credit, not on defense. Dismantling the two armies is the least complicated path to lasting peace. A second choice option would be partial or total integration, but that has to be tantamout to reorganizing the army to make sure all communities get represented, the Madhesis more than most, since the army so far has acted like the Madhesis are not part of Nepal.

Many questions have been raised as to the procedures of a constituent assembly. I think the solution is easy. Divide the country into 300 seats of roughly equal population, roughly squares or circles or approximations, ignoring the district boundaries, and hold elections. The largest may not have more than 5% more people than the smallest. Otherwise it will not be one person, one vote, but something else.

I stand optimistic, but I do realize there is still a lot of work to be done, a lot of revolutionary work. The revolution is very much on. People came out into the streets when they had to face batons and bullets. Now they will have to come out in the streets when they do not have to fear batons and bullets. This is extra true for the DaMaJaMa: Dalit, Madhesi, Janajati, Mahila.


Hamro Nepal, Latest
Hamro Nepal: Draft Constitution
Organization: Hamro Nepal
Your Many Identities

Ensuring Victory Was of the People

By Anil J. Shahi

The most recent proclamation by the King to restore the dissolved House of Parliament, and the subsequent welcome of the decision as the “people’s victory” by the Seven-Party Alliance comes as a bitter disappointment to those who believed the movement could have – or should have -- achieved much more: A Republican Democracy. What Nepal needs, we believe, is a total structural transformation, not just a power shift from feudalistic guardians to political elites. The total annihilation of the feudal structure, which protected the monarchy, and which, as in the post-1990 revolution, will probably continue to protect the political elites, should have been the ultimate goal of the recent movement. Given that the movement had gained tremendous momentum towards achieving that goal, sudden “agreement” to end it is seen by many as a great opportunity sorely missed.

Well, we have been hit by a heavy dose of realpolitik. The masses on the streets were probably beginning to feel battle-fatigue; common Kathmanduites beginning to feel the pinch caused by soaring prices of food, or the lack thereof. Many were likely getting tired of almost three weeks of curfews and unrests. The international community, particularly the Indians, still held firm to their long-standing policy of “twin pillars” in Nepal. And, most importantly, our so-called leaders never had the courage, or the vision, to believe in Nepal without the monarchy. Their demand of the revival of the dissolved House of Parliament was fundamentally flawed right from the beginning -- I am still wondering how the House that is to be governed by the Constitution of 1990, which does not allow amendments on the issue of a constitutional monarch, will be able to announce a Constituent Assembly that would ensure that the fate of the monarchy will be decided by the people.

Given that the outcome of the movement, however bitter, is probably sealed for now, I, for one, am willing to accept defeat and look forward, and try to make the most out of it. If the political leadership is to prove to the Nepalis that the movement was genuinely targeted at restoring sovereignty on the people, and not merely another grab at power, they must then act swiftly and decisively on several issues that are of utmost urgency at this transitional period.

First and foremost, they must consider replacing the Constitution of 1990 with an interim constitution. The new constitution must severely curtail the authority of the king. This should include, but not be limited to, his command of the army. Given the king’s notorious past records, there is a distinct possibility of him ordering the troops back into the barracks once again, making it extremely difficult for the new government to rule. In order to ensure firm loyalty of the army to the civilian government in the new structure, it might even be advisable that the new interim government replace senior army officials who might still hold utmost loyalty to the king with those who would be likely to submit to the collective will of the people of Nepal. The declaration of a new interim constitution would also pave the way for an unconditional Constituent Assembly election, ensuring that the fate of the monarchy would be in the hands of the people of Nepal. [The Constitution of 1990 sets forth the consolidation of “Constitutional Monarchy” in the preamble, making it not subject to any amendments.] This insistence on an unconditional Constituent Assembly does not presuppose a republican government as the ultimate goal; rather, the matter should be left for the Nepali people to decide through a Constituent Assembly. The wounded tiger is likely to strike back with greater vengeance, thus the new government must take into consideration any measure that would prepare them for any such surprises.

As stated in the agenda of the Seven Party Alliance, the issue of bringing the Maoists into peaceful mainstream politics should be of utmost priority as well. They should not only work to enhance their 12-point Memorandum of Understanding with the Maoists, but should make serious and honest efforts to reach a permanent peace accord with them. The peace agreement must be comprehensive and far-sighted – every aspect of conflict transformation must be addressed. Some that come to my mind at the moment are: Issues of gender, caste, and ethnicity; displacement; rehabilitation; disarmament; transitional justice; post conflict development; integration of the Maoist soldiers into the national army, etc. It would be prudent to seek international help in this regard. Maoists must also learn two important lessons from the recent Jana Andolan: a) Peaceful protests proved far more effective than armed revolution; and b) If the Nepali people were capable of making the monarch with a solid backing of the army capitulate, they can surely handle the Maoists too if it came to that. The Maoists must give up violence and their extreme communism.

It is also imperative that the interim government at least establish a framework for prosecuting any serious cases of corruption in the past, and of gross human rights violations during the conflict. The latter should not only include violators from both the security forces and the Maoists during the years of Maoist rebellion, but also those who committed such grave crimes during the 18-day nationwide uprising. From army generals to high-ranking officials of the king’s government, to the corrupt officials from the parties themselves, these criminals and rights violators must not be spared.

Many Nepalis have also been disappointed by the old leadership’s (leadership in this sense is already plural) refusal to recognize their past mistakes, step aside, and pave the way for new faces. That is to say, democratization of the leaders’ respective parties should also be in the agenda. After all, one cannot fathom a truly democratic country until the elements ruling it are democratic themselves. A good start would be for the members of the interim government to commit themselves to resign permanently from politics after the results of the Constituent Assembly are in and the new constitution formulated. I am sure people have appreciated all of their contributions to the country, and to the cause of its democracy, and would respect them even more if they submitted to new leadership, for the betterment of our country, in the nearest possible future. It would be a farce in the name of democracy if the people were to see the same Prime Minister who has failed the country in the past be allowed to assume the responsibility again.

Finally, the Nepali civil society that played a highly praiseworthy role in the fight for democracy must also not rest so fast. They must remain vigilant and alert of not only the king’s surprise actions, but also of the future democratic governments. It would be their duty to continue to ensure that people’s voices are being heard, and that the victory will not go futile, for the war is still going on.

While it may not have met the expectations of many, the end of Jana Andolan 2006, has ushered in a new era in Nepal, and has opened a window of opportunity for a better future. It surely is up to the leaders of Jana Andolan 2006 to prove to the disenchanted that it is not going to be an utterly disappointing déjà vu all over again. It is incumbent upon the leaders to prove that the Andolan was truly about the people and not just the political leaders. Nepalis have had to fight for democracy five times in nearly six decades -- almost once every ten years – in 1952, 1962, 1979, 1989, and 2006 – and one would hope that this time, it’s for good.




Chitralekha Yadav: Speaker


I think this is of a great symbolic value. She earned her way to the top. She was a student leader when she was a student. Now she is Speaker. She is a Madhesi. She is a woman. She is a Yadav, which not exactly a Dalit, but it is not traditionally high caste.

Chitralekha Yadav is proof democracy is a wonderful thing.

This is a good start for the revived parliament.

On The Web

Ranabhat resigns; Chitralekha Yadav to take over as Speaker in Nepal
Chitralekha Yadav to take over as Speaker in Nepal
People's Review:July 01-July 08, 1999:Chitralekha Yadav elected un ... UML general secretary Madhab Kumar Nepal had demanded to provide the post of deputy speaker to the opposition party in the Parliament for the betterment of enhancing democratic exercise and balance in the Parliament. But, the NC didn't listen to Nepal.
NEWS FLASH ARCHIVE 49 Mrs Yadav was elected to the House of Representatives from Siraha-2 constituency. .....
Front Pagers May 31st, 1999 / Jestha 17, 2056 Awake Weekly ...
Nepal Home Page Results of Parliamentary elections held on November 15th, 1994 Siraha 2. UML Mr.Narendraraj Pokhrel Ms.Chitralekha Yadav, Congress
Metro The diploma engineers accorded a reception to the deputy speaker of the Nepal parliament, Chitralekha Yadav, at the Institute of Diploma Engineers, Bangladesh in Dhaka on Tuesday. Since the formation of the SAARC Diploma Engineers Forum in 1990s, Nepal parliament deputy speaker Chitralekha Yadav, also a human rights activist, helped the forum a lot, said the organisation’s secretary general. The biggest challenge of South Asia is poverty, said Chitralekha Yadav. By ensuring economic justice, poverty can be eradicated, she said. The general secretary, Kazi Nazrul Islam, handed over a crest to Chitralekha.
Tin tuc va su kien
Women and Armed Conflict: Reaching Towards Focused Solutions The guests on the occasion were Honorable Deputy Speaker, House of Representatives, Ms. Chitralekha Yadav, Mr. Yog Prasad Upadhyay, former home minister and Ambassador to the United States of America, and Mr. Dev Raj Dahal, Country Representative, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Ms. Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Chairperson, House of Representatives and Chief Guest on the occasion after expressing her thanks to the organizers mentioned that the topic of the interaction is very relevant to our times. She mentioned that today the nation and particularly its women are facing a critical problem as a victim. The war widows of the current insurgency are from all sectors- be it Maoist, Police, Army or the civilian masses. These women are under immense pressure in a particularly traditional society like ours. Relating her personal experience while interacting with these women she mentioned that the husband's family attributes the death of their son to the bad omen brought by the son's widow....... ...... According to her reasoning the qualifying factors for the current conflict is the lack of education, poverty, lack of decentralization and need for structural change. In the years of democratic rule in Nepal she points out that neither organizations, which strengthen democracy, were developed nor could the existing organizations be really democratized. This is a particular failure of democratic politics. She mentioned that war widows specially their children face a difficult and bleak future. The challenge and need before us is to mould and implement our policies and programs to face these emerging problem areas. She mentioned a lack of political commitment in policy formulation and a few self-centered politicians as having held the country at ransom for their own personal stakes. The current dilemma is a result of self-centered and profit centered politics at the expense of people centered politics, which is the core of democratic value......... Women in particular have been deprived of opportunities for full participation even though wherever they have reached important positions; they have been able to perform efficiently and optimally. She further mentioned that participation is necessary to women's development. In this context she provided an illustration of the lack of such participation right at the top- in the Cabinet. There is a quota system in cabinet, which is applicable in the case of Women, Madhesi (People of tarai), Scheduled caste (Dalits) and scheduled tribes (Janjatis) community. She questioned the appropriateness of the same in the context of limitless seats for the other general communities regardless of their qualification. This is an unjust situation and a big question mark on social justice. She felt that if such a situation persists in the membership of the cabinet who themselves are supposed to be precursors of change; the situation is unimaginable in the rest of Nepal.......... Ms. Yadav differentiated between the conflicts of 20th and 21st century by pointing that while the former was mostly external the latter, particularly in the case of Nepal is absolutely internal. In such internal strifes and conflicts a common man faces difficulty in differentiating between what is right and wrong and who is right or wrong. She mentioned that external voices like UN can only speak and advise us but the onus lies in the hand of Nepalese who have to deal with this problem. She lamented that in this era of information and knowledge, we Nepalese have both but lack virtuousness and are caught in self-centered thinking. She feels that at the root of present conflict is lack of social, political and economic justice. She stressed the importance of economic justice and economic development, which should move simultaneously. She mentioned that imbalance between village and cities, caste, ethnic and gender based discrimination results in loss of opportunities of various kinds like in job and education sector. As one of the solutions she advocated that only when a nation invests in women that things can change, citing the quote, " Invest in women and invest in change". She mentioned that conflict results when nation's people and particular sections get disillusioned, dissatisfied and irritated due to lack of justice. This is a typical stimulus response situation, which if not addressed adequately will only further the reasons for conflict. Therefore she called upon all women and men to come together to uproot this problem by finding out avenues and opportunities. She pointed out though, the need for us to be clear about our mission and vision and work in a determined manner to achieve our goal of a just and peaceful society. She also pointed out to the need of fine-tuning national policy and program to the needs arisen out of the conflict. She expressed confidence in the ability of ordinary people to do extraordinary work, once they are exposed to ideas and knowledge the bottom line being involvement of all parties (related to conflict) to chalk out workable solutions.
New Signature
Present Composition of Parliament of Nepal
Terai Dalit Women - Violation of Political Rights Chitralekha Yadav (Nepali Congress), one of the women MP’s from Siraha district in Terai was elected Deputy Speaker of House of Representatives. Renu Yadav (RPP) was appointed Minister in the Government formed under the premiership of Surya Bahadur Thapa. Although both the women were not Dalits, the election of two women from the Terai and their appointment to important posts is a significant development....... No Terai Dalit woman was ever nominated by any major political party for any seat in Parliament. Terai Dalit women have remained unrepresented in Parliament since restoration of multi-party democracy in Nepal in 1990. Although some Dalits have been nominated as members of upper house of Parliament (Rashtriya Sabha), these have not included Terai Dalit women.
Table of Contents for the report of the Asia-Pacific Women ...
Highlights from Plenary1 of the Asia-Pacific Women ...
Trang web tỉnh Đồng Nai - Delegates from Nepalese Parliament visit ... On April 11, Nepalese delegation headed by Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Chairperson of Lower House of Nepalese Parliament, has paid a visit to Dong Nai.
NDF QUOTES - Nepali Times “Heaven is what it is because three women are in charge of three important ministries: Mahalaxmi manages money, Mahasaraswati is in charge of education and Mahakali looks after defence. We can also turn Nepal into heaven, why not?” - Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Speaker
The Hindu : International : Nepal's Deputy Speaker, two others ... Deputy Speaker of Nepal's Parliament Chitralekha Yadav and two other women activists were on Saturday stopped by security personnel at the Tribhuvan International Airport here from boarding a flight to Delhi, where they were going to participate in a conference. ...... ``This was the third time that I was prevented to fly abroad since the February one power grab by King Gyanendra,'' Ms. Yadav, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, said.
Bao Dong Nai Recently, Nepalese delegation headed by Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Speaker of Lower House of Nepalese Parliament has paid a visit to Dong Nai.
South Asia Monitor
Militarisation and WTO are key challenges in the fight against HIV ...
Trade union activists call to fuel the fight against HIV/AIDS
News Archive - Millennium Campaign
Non-Resident Nepali Association
The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - World
[PDF] Summary of the Proceeding of Workshop on Decentralization, Local ...
[PDF] NTPEPC 79#.p65
Financial Express Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Speaker of Lower House of Nepalese Parliament, told Vice State President Truong My Hoa during their meeting in Hanoi that she was impressed by Viet Nam's socio- economic achievements as well as its progress in legal reform.
Onlypunjab.com News
Viet Nam News
BBC NEWS | World | South Asia | Nepal women win abortion rights The former Deputy Speaker, Chitralekha Yadav, says the legislation has now been given royal assent and is on the statute books.
Democracy For Nepal (DFN): Peace First, Then Democracy, Democracy ...
Democracy For Nepal (DFN): Three Years: Too Long A Wait
Hội liên hiệp Phụ nữ - Việt nam
South Asian Media Net Among the elected ones, Prakash Man Singh won the largest number of votes (1192). Other outstanding winners were Pradip Giri with 1040 votes, Umakanta Chaudhari with 1036, Chitralekha Yadav with 991, Gopal Man Shrestha with 969 votes and Bimalendra Nidhi with 929 votes.
People's Review:July 01-July 08,1999: Table of Contents
A third of Maoist guerrillas are women: report
South Asia Partnership - South Asia: The Canadian delegation in ...
.:: THE BANGLADESH OBSERVER - Net Edition ::. “Without ensuring and increasing participation of women at various levels of the government, a better society cannot be built,” Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Speaker of the Lower House of Representatives of Nepal, told reporters at a news conference.
The Tribune, Chandigarh, India - World
eKantipur.com - Nepal's No.1 News Portal He also suggested the parties oust Speaker Tara Nath Ranabhat for his lack of commitment to the movement for democracy. "We should elect Deputy Speaker Chitralekha Yadav in his place," Sherchan said.
BBC NEWS | South Asia | Mock parliament meets in Nepal The deputy speaker of the dissolved parliament, Chitralekha Yadav, took the role of chairing the meeting which was held in a public square in Kathmandu

In The News

New Nepal commits to Maoist talks
Calcutta Telegraph, India - 21 hours ago
... Deputy speaker Chitralekha Yadav was in the chair as Speaker Taranath Rana Bhat had been forced to resign for not joining the democratic movement. ...
Koirala to be sworn-in as Nepal PM tomorrow
Hindu, India - 16 hours ago
... During Friday's meeting of the House of Representatives, Deputy Speaker Chitralekha Yadav tabled a motion, on behalf of Koirala, proposing a ceasefire with the ...
Yechury in Nepal democracy pantheon
Calcutta Telegraph, India - 18 hours ago
... parliament, it was left to former foreign minister and a good friend of India, Chakra Prasad Bastola, to send a note to deputy speaker Chitralekha Yadav. ...
Parliament meets in Nepal
Hindu, India - Apr 28, 2006
DEMOCRACY ENTHRONED: Speaker of the Nepalese Parliament Chitralekha Yadav addresses the House at the first session of the reinstated Parliament in Kathmandu on ...
Nepal Parliament meets after four years
NewKerala.com, India - Apr 28, 2006
... The House of Representatives session was today presided over by the deputy speaker, Chitralekha Yadav. Taranath Ranabhatt, the previous ...
After four years, more delay for Nepal's parliament
NewKerala.com, India - Apr 28, 2006
... Meanwhile, the seven parties expected to form the government met at the chamber of deputy Speaker Chitralekha Yadav to discuss the changed modalities. ...
Nepal seeks to learn from Viet Nam's development experience
Viet Nam News Agency, Vietnam - Apr 4, 2006
Chitralekha Yadav, Deputy Speaker of Lower House of Nepalese Parliament, told Vice State President Truong My Hoa during their meeting in Ha Noi that she was ...


KP Oli likely to be deputy PM; Cabinet strength not to exceed 21
Arjun Bhandari
Kathmandu, April 29:
The seven-party alliance is learnt to have finalised the list of ministers for the all-party government led by Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala.
Koirala is scheduled to swear in tomorrow morning at the Narayanhiti Royal Palace before the parliament debates his proposal for an election to a constituent assembly. The proposal to hold the election to the constituent assembly for drafting a new constitution was tabled in yesterday’s session of the 205-member revived House of Representatives.
Alliance source said the number of ministers would not exceed 21. Sources said at least six ministers each will be drawn from the NC and the CPN-UML, three from the Nepali Congress (Democratic), one from the Nepal Sadbhavana Party (Anandi) and two from civil society.
The Nepal Workers’ and Peasants’ Party and Janamorcha Nepal are learnt to have decided to stay away from joining the all-party government. Sources said they want to join an interim government of which the Maoists are also a part.
The sources said NC general secretary Ramchandra Poudel may be asked to look after either Physical Planning and Works or Local Development, joint general secretary Dr Ram Sharan Mahat Finance, Chakra Prasad Bastola Foreign Affairs, Mahesh Archarya Defence, Mahantha Thakur Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, while Tirtha Ram Dangol was likely to be appointed Health and Population minister.
UML standing committee member K P Sharma Oli may become deputy-prime minister in addition to holding Home portfolio, Pradip Nepal may be given either Information and Communication or Water Resources ministry, Rajendra Pandey Local Development, Pradip Gyawali Civil Aviation, Tourism and Culture, Urmila Aryal Women, Children and Social Welfare, while Prof Mangal Siddhi Manandhar may be given the charge of Industry, Commerce and Supplies Ministry.
NC-D general secretaries Prakash Man Singh and Bimalendra Nidhi may be given the charge of Labour and Transport Management and Education and Sport, respectively, while Dr Prakash Sharan Mahat is likely to be Environment, Science and Technology Minister. NSP general secretary Hridayesh Tripathi is likely to take the responsibility of Forest and Soil Conservation ministry.
Two ministerial berths for civil society were yet to be finalised. Sources said alliance is considering former speaker Daman Nath Dhungana, Dr Devenrda Raj Pandey, senior journalist Kanak Mani Dixit and Dr Sundar Mani Dixit for the remaining portfolios.
(Source: The Himalayan Times)

Could Girija Be President?
Girija's House Revival Stand: The Real Reason
Phone Talk With Girija Koirala: Meeting History Itself

Seven Party Forum In Jackson Heights

Hridayesh Tripathy Released
Hridayesh Tripathi Arrested
Phone Talk With Madhav Nepal, Hridayesh Tripathy
Hridayesh Tripathy
Phone Talk With Hridayesh Tripathy
Hridayesh Tripathy In Delhi: Good News

Kanak Mani Dixit, Rhoderick Chalmers

Friday, April 28, 2006

Zimpundit: Zimbabwe


The First Major Revolution Of The 21st Century Happened In Nepal
Democracy Spreading Mechanism
The Demosphere Manifesto
5 Steps To Democracy
Proposed Constitution

I first found Zimpundit at Mary Joyce's blog.

Zimpundit and I just crosslinked to each other. This is exciting. I first found him out because he had a blog entry where he was waxing eloquent about Nepal. As in, look at Nepal, why can't we have it as good in Zimbabwe? That caught my attention. One thing, though, Zimpundit, noone saw the April Revolution coming on April 5. But when it finally came, it came like a tsunami.

Well, I went ahead and looked around. I have read bits and pieces on Mugabe over time, but never much thoroughly.

Looks like the guy is a former freedom fighter gone despotic, if he ever was anything else. I mean, how else has he been in power for two and a half decades non stop? It is not possible for someone like him to be popular. This guy is black, but he is totally colonial. He is your typical Third World dictator. He does not understand property rights, he does not understand land reform, he sure does not understand you can do both. He does not understand, or much care about things like free speech, freedom of press. He hounds poor Zimbabweans living in shanty towns because they oppose him. How much of a freedom fighter can you be if you do that?

He bungled land reform horrendously, and collapsed the economy. Now he turns around blames Britain for the collapsed economy.

The goal can not be to reform Mugabe. This guy is beyond repair. The goal has to be to oust him. I think the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) needs to build a strong base globally, and at the same time build a strong organization inside the country. The goal has to be to get people to come out into the streets in one big jamboree of protest. But there is a lot of homework you have to do beforehand. Lessons can be learned from the Nepal experience in that Nepal is a poor country also, one of the poorest. But then poverty is a big reason why the people need to rebel and topple a despot. Be desperate, act desperate. On the other hand, the Zimbabwe experience will be unique, very much of its own. Nepal can be a lesson, but the idea can not be to replicate. There is much improvisation in any democracy movement.

We should take it a challenge to drive Mugabe out. I propose we deport him to Britain.

The challenge is to raise the political consciousness of the people enough to get them out into the streets in large numbers. The
Zimbabwean diaspora could play a key role.

Zimpundit, in solidarity.

But looks like the Zimbabwe strategy might be hovering around the 2008 presidential elections in that country. Fair enough. Give it a shot. And looks like South Africa is a ready base for the
Zimbabwean diaspora. South Africa might be Zimbabwe's India.

One flaw I see in the opposition. Why is there talk only of beating the despot at the election booth? Is the constitution okay? Does it need to be amended? Or replaced? It must be a flawed constitution that has kept him in power for so long. The stink in Zimbabwe is bigger than that the opposition has been losing elections. So more than electoral victory has to be the political platform.

On The Web

CIA - The World Factbook -- Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Zimbabwe Independent - The Leading Business Weekly Newspaper
Zimbabwe Financial Gazette
New Zimbabwe.com News :: The Zimbabwe News You Trust
BBC News - Country Profile: Zimbabwe economy is in tatters, where poverty and unemployment are endemic and political strife and repression commonplace...... the forced seizure of almost all white-owned commercial farms, with the stated aim of benefiting landless black Zimbabweans, led to sharp falls in production and precipitated the collapse of the agriculture-based economy ....... hundreds of thousands of Zimbabweans, including much-needed professionals, have emigrated...... Aid agencies and critics partly blame food shortages on the land reform programme. The government blames a long-running drought, and Mr Mugabe has accused Britain and its allies of sabotaging the economy in revenge for the redistribution programme...... government's urban slum demolition drive in 2005 ...... critics accused him of destroying slums housing opposition supporters..... The former Rhodesia has a history of conflict, with white settlers dispossessing the resident population, guerrilla armies forcing the white government to submit to elections, and the post-independence leadership committing atrocities in southern areas where it lacked the support of the Matabele people....... Mugabe played a key role in ending white rule in Rhodesia and he and his Zanu-PF party have dominated Zimbabwe's politics since independence in 1980....... the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) ..... members have been killed, tortured and harassed by Zanu-PF supporters ...... Mugabe belongs to the African liberationist tradition of the 1960s - strong and ruthless leadership, anti-Western, suspicious of capitalism and deeply intolerant of dissent and opposition...... His economic policies are widely seen as being geared to short-term political expediency and the maintenance of power for himself. Mr Mugabe has defended his land reform programme, saying the issue is the "core social question of our time"....... All broadcasters transmitting from Zimbabwean soil and the main newspapers are state-controlled and toe the government line...... The private press, relatively vigorous in its criticism of the government, has come under severe pressure. A leading privately-owned daily, the Daily News, is subject to a publication ban. ....... A weekly newspaper, The Zimbabwean, is produced in London and is distributed in Zimbabwe as an international publication, and among Zimbabweans living abroad..... State-run Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC) operates the country's only TV and radio stations........ The Voice of the People, set up by former ZBC staff with funding from the Soros Foundation and a Dutch NGO, operates using a leased shortwave transmitter in Madagascar...... Another station, the UK-based SW Radio Africa, aims to give listeners in Zimbabwe "unbiased information". The station's signal was jammed in March 2005, a period coinciding with the run-up to parliamentary elections.......
allAfrica.com: Zimbabwe
African Studies Center | Zimbabwe Page
ZWNEWS.com - linking the world to Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe Travel Information | Lonely Planet Destination Guide

In The News

Zimbabwe: Espionage Plan Unconstitutional AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: Govt to Print $60 Trillion to Meet Salary Bill
AllAfrica.com, Washington
ZIMBABWE: Government to tap cyberspace Reuters AlertNet
ZIMBABWE : Govt defends plan to monitor cyber-communication African News Dimension
Zimbabwe: Opposition Gangs Up AllAfrica.com OPPOSITION political groups and civil society movements have started consultations to form a united front to support one candidate in the 2008 presidential election, 23 months ahead of the crucial poll....... factions of the divided Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), other opposition parties and civil society groups in a bid to form a broad united front against Zanu PF along the lines of Kenya's National Rainbow Coalition which brought President Mwai Kibaki to power in 2002....... South African-based Zimbabwe Diaspora Civil Society Organisations Forum ...... formed in November 2005 as a network of at least 20 local civic movements based in South Africa working for a democratic dispensation in Zimbabwe....... United People's Movement -- a shadowy assemblage of disgruntled Zanu PF officials ...... the MDC split in October last year.... there has been a lot of SMS messages and phone calls flying around among the officials trying to come up with a united front against Zanu PF....... Both Tsvangirai and Mutambara have been calling for the formation of a united front against Zanu PF.
Zimbabwe: Don't Burn the Whole House AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: Tsvangirai Piles Pressure On Rump Mutambara Group
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Arthur Mutambara Faction of Zimbabwe's Opposition Struggles to ... Voice of America
Zimbabwe: Taking It to the Streets AllAfrica.com
Zimbabwe: Labour Day's Soulful Prayer
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: ZFTU Members Bury the Hatchet AllAfrica.com
Zimbabwe: RBA to Rule in ZABG Dispute
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: RBZ Warns Market to Brace for Liquidity Storms AllAfrica.com
Zimbabwe: Govt Orders 'Flying Coffins' for AirZim
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: Tobacco Season Off to a Bad Start
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: Govt Stranger to Reality
AllAfrica.com, Washington
Zimbabwe: Zimplats Cautious On Fresh Mine Seizure Threats AllAfrica.com
Katsonga Contradicts Mugabe AllAfrica.com
Zimbabwe : Hospital fees up 3000 percent
African News Dimension, South Africa
Zimbabwe : Foreigners to pay hospital fees in forex African News Dimension
Zim wants foreign currency News24

Undercurrents Of A Counter-Revolution






This is a curious assemblage of people rallying against the idea of a constituent assembly. That assembly is what this revolution has been about. That assembly is what will bring peace and democracy. I don't know what this crowd is thinking.

In The News

First HoR session: PM Koirala proposes for constituent assembly NepalNews
Oli to lead CPN-UML in the new government
Nepali people’s verdict acceptable to India: Yechuri
Change is in the air: Maoist leaders address public meeting in Kathmandu

Maoist leaders at Khulla Manch Kantipur Publications
First meet of reinstated HoR concludes, Koirala's proposal to hold CA elections registered
Constituent assembly excellent avenue: US
Senior bureaucrats for Karki's ouster
ँसंविधानसभा पहिलो एजेन्डा’
अमेरिका संविधानसभाप्रति आशावादी
खबरदारी सभा
माओवादी अभियान सहरमा
माओवादी नेता सार्वजनिक
संविधान सभाको मार्गचित्रबारे अन्तर्त्रिया
आज सिंहदरबार घेराउ
सात दलका एजेन्डा मान्न निर्देशन
मुख्य सचिव नहटाए काम ठप्प’
युद्धविराममा शान्तिपूर्ण आन्दोलन'
राज्यले पनि युद्धविराम गर्नुपर्छ’
जनमोर्चाद्वारा खबरदारी सभा
प्रधानमन्त्री कोइरालाको जिम्मेवारी
घाइतेको कलमबाट
संविधानसभाको अभ्यास
अब आठ दलको मोर्चा
अन्तरिम शासन विधान जारी गर

Nepal Strife Has Little Impact on Villages ABC News
Nepal House extends hands to Maoists Daily News & Analysis, India
Parliament in Nepal Convenes After 4 Year Break Zaman Online, Turkey
Mao, Nasser & Nepal Monsters and Critics.com, UK
Norwegian minister to visit Nepal to push talks Moneycontrol.com, India
Nepal parliament weighing constitution rewrite after first meeting JURIST

Visitors

Page views yesterday366
28 April12:25com hem AB, Sweden
28 April12:32D. E. Shaw & Co., New York, United States
28 April12:51United States Navy, United States
28 April13:12United Nations, New York, United States
28 April13:17NTL Internet, Brighton, United Kingdom
28 April13:26U.S. Department of Agriculture, United States
28 April13:36Philippines (gsilink.ph)
28 April13:38University of Maryland, Baltimore, United States
28 April13:55University of Louisville, Louisville, United States


28 April14:49Baylor University, Waco, United States
28 April15:17Türk Telekom, Turkey
28 April15:27Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States
28 April15:31San Francisco State University, San Francisco, United States

Top 10 Video Clips

Video Blogging Is The Way To Go 1156 4
Pin Plan 16 1064 23
Howard Dean 951 0
Connecticut Traffic 3 803 2
Democracy Forum Americana 2 782 9
Smita Narula 446 10
Nepal Message To Top Democrats 442 1
Quixtar Headquarters Ada Michigan 393 1
Nepali Mandir 22 387 16
Dinesh Tripathi, Your Worst Nightmare 11 371 20
Totals 27999 327

Maoist Posturing


On April 25th, a "Letter to the Editor" appeared in the leading Nepali language Kantipur newspaper from Baburam Bhattarai, one of the leaders of the CPN(M). The letter sets out a clear understanding of the revolutionary moment, and warns the parliamentary politicians that were they to attempt a new arrangement with the King they would be swept aside.
The king came out saying he is for taking the country ahead "according to the road map of the agitating Seven Party Alliance." (18 Days Of April Revolution: Victory) After victory, the seven party alliance has time and again expressed its commitment to that same roadmap. The roadmap leads to a constituent assembly. And so this saber rattling on the part of the Maoists is uncalled for.

One can understand that the Maoists might want to try and drive a hard bargain in what they expect to be an integration of the two armies, but you don't go about doing that by trying to sabotage the very process that might make such an integration possible.

The Maoists need to engage in trust building, not in posturing. Their posturing is not helping the cause of constituent assembly.

The Nepali Congress might have talked of a constituent assembly half a century ago. Heck, that party even picked up arms back then. But it is the Maoists who have taken the lead on the idea of a constituent assembly this past decade. Parties like the Sadbhavana might claim they have been asking for a constituent assembly for a longer period of time, but it is the Maoists who brought the issue to the center of the country's politics. I give them credit for that. The seven party alliance came around to the idea of a constituent assembly only much later.

But now is not the time to bicker on such finesse.

The April Revolution was a superb experiment in non-violence. Not even the seven party alliance saw it coming. The original April 6-9 program grew into a tsunami of people across the country and surprised both the SPA and the Maoists. Both have rushed to take credit. The credit goes to the people.

The Maoists need to stop trying to pressure the seven party alliance to head for a constituent assembly when that is precisely what the seven parties are trying to do, on their own. The seven parties don't need convincing, and they are very much on schedule. The alliance is on track.

The worst part of this Maoist posturing and saber rattling is that the worst fears about the Maoists start to come alive. Are we going to see a new round of civil war with the state army on the side of the seven parties? Will the seven parties end up seeking military aid from India, America and Europe should that happen? Those questions arise. So the Maoists need to stop pushing and start behaving.

I am not being naive. We have to maitain vigilance. There might be members and cliques of the old, discredited regime that might make attempts to spoil the party, even if unsuccessfully. And we have to watch out for that. But you don't do that by unnecessarily hammering the seven party alliance. You are beating the wrong drum when you are beating up on the seven party alliance at this point in time.

So Baburam, Prachanda, chill. Take it easy. The roadmap to the constituent assembly is very much on track. Focus your energies on the peace talks that are next. Organize rallies and mass meetings. Prepare for the next steps. Prepare for the constituent assembly. Stop badgering the seven party alliance.
Baburam Bhattarai: "The degree of active participation of the common people, the nature of that participation, the level of their motivation can only be compared with that of major revolutions in history."
The First Major Revolution Of The 21st Century Happened In Nepal

The Revolution Is Very Much On
Reciprocate The Maoist Ceasefire Immediately
Army Under Parliament, Now
Declare Constituent Assembly On First Day Of Parliament
Maoist Reaction To Democratic Victory: Not Right

In The News

Interview of Li Onesto on CNN
NPR: Exploring the Complex Politics of Nepal
US Senate Resolution On Nepal INSN
NYT: Editorial Samrat Upadhyay INSN
US can remove red corner notice INSN
The Americans are leaving, State Department stays on INSN
Saga of compromise and struggle continues INSN
Baburam: Parliament by king’s mercy Kantipur

PM's swearing-in ceremony delayed NepalNews
The first session of the parliament commencing today
Yechuri arriving in Kathmandu today
RPP offers help to resolve key problems
Senior bureaucrats demand action against chief secy.
Leaders vow not to repeat past mistakes; say constituent assembly will be the first agenda of HoR
Koirala taken ill

The Revolution in Nepal Rediff, India
Nepal: Parliament to meet and usher in crucial period of change ... ReliefWeb (press release)
Nepal Parliament set to reopen NDTV.com, India
Yechuri in Nepal as Koirala forms Govt. CNN-IBN, India
People issue notice to palace Calcutta Telegraph
Over 300 activists released in Nepal Chennai Online
Nepal PM-designate too sick for swearing-in
Reuters AlertNet, UK
Nepal's PM too ill for ceremony Daily Telegraph
Nepal PM-designate too ill for swearing-in Independent Online
Yechury basks in Nepal glory
Calcutta Telegraph, India
COMMENT: Nepal’s eye-opening political ordeal — Tanvir Ahmad ...
Daily Times, Pakistan
Read the Nepal quake right
Indian Express, India

Visitors

Page views yesterday366
27 April22:11Kwansei Gakuin University, Japan
27 April22:35IceTel, Costa Rica
27 April22:37Equant, Venezuela
27 April22:39Telecomunicacoes de Sao Paulo SA, Brazil
27 April22:45Corporate Access (HK), China


27 April23:15Nepal (wlink.com.np)
27 April23:17Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd., Nepal
27 April23:33Nepal (wlink.com.np)
27 April23:42Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Australia
27 April23:43Mercantile Communications Pvt. Ltd., Nepal
27 April23:51Tufts University, Medford, United States
28 April00:02Nepal (wlink.com.np)
28 April00:04Nepal (wlink.com.np)


28 April00:06Nepal (wlink.com.np)


28 April00:07Nepal (wlink.com.np)
28 April00:15Wipro NET Ltd., India
28 April00:40Bahrain Telecommunication Company, Bahrain

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Madhav Nepal




1

December 27, 2005.

Madhavji.

This is me establishing a private channel of communication with you. The webpages in this folder are protected from the search engines, and hence are private.

You know much more about Nepali politics than I do. And I am not trying to crown anybody. Yahan New York City basee basee. Ra tapain lai thaha nai chha I have a family relationship with the Sadbhavana. I am a Sadbhavana person. Although I do have a healthy respect for the UML. But it is my commitment to the ideal of democracy and the difficult situation that Nepal is in that draws me to you.

Yo bigat dui mahina ma UML le dekhayeko agrasarata sarhai nai sarahaniya chha.

Huna ta tapain le baddapan dekhaunu bhako chha. UML will not lay the alliance hostage on the PM issue bhannu bha chha. But I think the times for niceties are passe.

I think you have to mentally prepare yourself to be the interim Prime Minister. It is a choice between you and GPK, but he is disqualified. (1) Your party is much larger than his. (2) You and your party practice internal democracy much better than him. There is no Nepal family thing going on in the UML. (3) In preferring to go straight to the interim government idea, you do realize the pitfalls of reviving the House. (4) You and your party have offered a greater clarity. (5) Your rallies have been drawing the larger crowds. (6) Koirala's health is failing.

But the biggest reason is that the job of the interim Prime Minister is going to be very hard. This is not going to be like for Kisunji. Your job will be much tougher. GPK simply can not do it. You must mentally prepare. You can not come forward until the time is ripe. But in your mind you should have no doubts. It is you. It can not be GPK.

You will be the interim Prime Minister. And likely your party will also win a majority in the parliament after a new constitution. So you will also be the first PM post-democracy, post-elections. It is important to be clear about this. Because you will be the person taming the army.

The roadmap I suggest is of an interim government and an interim constitution that makes the PM the Commander In Chief of the army. Then, through UN and major powers mediation, you would partially integrate the Maoist army into the state army. So there is only one army when the country goes through elections for a constituent assembly.

Then as duly elected PM and C In C, you would downsize the integrated army and bring it down in size to 30,000. And also reorganize the army. A lot of the people at the top will likely get fired. But you perhaps do not want to do all that as interim PM. As interim PM, you just want to make the army get used to the idea that a janata ko chhora is C In C. Visit a lot of the barracks. Meet a lot of foot soldiers. Attend many of the army ceremonies. Regularly hold meetings with the army top brass and be seen giving them instructions. Basically showing people you really are in command.

I don't believe GPK could do all this. I respect his decades' long contribution to democracy. But the future can not be held hostage to that past.

Dealing with the king is not going to be easy. The guy still has a few cards he can play.

Then there is the constituent assembly itself. That is a lot of work. GPK would not have the skill or the stamina.

So think of the country. And mentally decide now that you are the interim PM in waiting.

I will stay in touch.

On to victory.


2

January 9, 2006.

Madhavji.

Your party has offered clarity with two words: democratic republic. My focusing on your individual name is the same thing. It is about clarity. The more clarity we can offer, less talk there will be of some kind of a vacuum.

Why you? Because it is between you and GPK. But it has to be you because you lead the largest party, and you are the more qualified. If Hridayesh Tripathy were leading the largest party, it would have been him. It is a simple democratic choice, a simple mathematical calculation on my part.

But the bigger reason is to make sure all possible worst case scenarios are avoided, and there is this one person who puts a lot of thought into it.

What could be some of the worst case scenarios?

  1. The king could impose martial law. It would hurt him further, but he could go for it if he feels desperate enough.
  2. The king could get ousted, and the army could stage a coup if the ouster is chaotic. Pyar Jung could become the Nepali Musharraf.
  3. The king could get ousted, the army could get disbanded, and the Maoists could change their mind and go back to their goal of a communist republic, to be achieved immediately. Nepal could end up a one party state of the Maoists.
I don't see any of these three happening. But we do have to watch out. And there has to be this one person who is going to be the interim prime minister as well as the first president of Nepal who will make sure these three scenarios do not unfold.

Girija Babu has a huge stature, but then so did Ganesh Man Singh. This is not about disrespect. This is about what will be best for the country.

It is not just about mainstreaming the Maoists, it is also about mainstreaming the RNA. And neither can really be trusted. We don't trust them. We trust the roadmap that we create. We trust them both one step at a time.

I would think the Maoists do not get to join the interim government before the peace talks are successfully concluded. And the country does not go through a constituent assembly before the two armies are integrated. The army will be in your command, not that of the UN. The army top brass will accept you, but not the UN. That is my reading of the situation.

You become Commander In Chief as interim PM, but you only make changes at the top levels of the army as a duly elected President. Give them some time to get used to the idea. Being UML General Secretary, interim PM, Commander In Chief, and President will be four different things, although all related.

But those are down the line. The first task is to dismantle this regime, and I think you and your seven party colleagues are on schedule. We are honored to be supporting you from this end.

On to victory. The horizon is crimson.

Interim President: Madhav Nepal
Phone Talk With Madhav Nepal, Hridayesh Tripathy
Maoist, Moriarty, Madhav, Manmohan: Get Behind The 3 Point Program
Madhav Nepal, Commander Of The Movement
Email From Madhav Kumar Nepal

Sushil Pyakurel
Sushil Pyakurel In Brussels

Kiran Nepal
Kiran Nepal, Dinesh Wagle
Dinesh Wagle, Kiran Nepal In Town

Bharat Mohan Adhikari Is In Town