Friday, October 21, 2005

The Army Rank And File Need To Be For The People And Democracy


Nepal's army has had a long, illustrious history. A lot of Nepali armed men have made a name for themselves all over the world over decades. But now that army stands at a historic juncture.

Armies are to fight external enemies. In rare cases they also get mobilized to confront internal armed groups. But peaceful demonstrators for democracy are out of bounds.

This is my appeal to all thinking officers in the Nepal army top to bottom.

The democracy movement is about to be launched in full force. The democratic government, once it gets into power, will punish all acts of physical assault on the peaceful demonstrators. Noone who might give orders for such physical assaults will go scot free this time.

This movement is not against the state structure. This is not a movement against the police, the army, the bureaucracy. This is a movement for democracy. This is a movement to create a democratic Nepal where the police, the army and the bureaucracy all work for the people, answer to the people. This is about transferring the ownership of the state to the people. This is not a movement to dismantle the state.

An army within a democratic Nepal will get better treated than it has ever been before. A democratic Nepal will be more prosperous, more proud. It will be more vibrant. It will be a happier country. The army will feel more at home in a democratic Nepal.

The army within a democratic Nepal will be a professional army. The promotion and perks structure will get vastly more meritocratic. There will be many more options for career advancements for its many officers. There will be many more opportunities for domestic pride and international peacekeeping.

A professional army in a democratic Nepal will be of unprecedented pride to all its members.

That army could become one of the symbols of national unity.

There will be peace in a democratic Nepal. The insurgency will be over. The army will no longer lose its members to meaningless violence.

The army, any army, ultimately is a keeper of peace, not a wager of war.

The army of a democratic Nepal will be more respected by the UN. The armed men and women of the Nepal army will be ambassadors of Nepal working for peace in the far flung corners of the planet.

That bright promise of a future requires that the rank and file and officers at all levels of the army be willing to appreciate the historic juncture the country is in. This movement for democracy is to be a once in a lifetime experience. This is to be decisive. This will not have to waged ever again.

The rank and file of the army, officers at all levels should be willing to defy orders as a last resort, if that is what it will take to make sure the villains of the current regime do not think they have the option to militarily crush the democracy movement.

All the army has to do is to stay out of the way. That is all.

And in return it will get treated like a professional army by the subsequent democratic government. It will get a respect it has never had before.

This is my appeal.

I urge all Nepalis all over the world who are supporting the movement in all ways they can to use all possible personal contacts they have inside the army to pass on this message.

Assault On Kantipur FM: The Regime Preparing For A Showdown


The assault on Kantipur FM premises is a window into what is about to happen. The regime is preparing for a showdown. The clouds are gathering.

They first made an illegal visit. Then they made an illegal request. When the Kantipur FM people did not comply, they sent the police to gherao the premises. Finally they backed down.

That is what will happen after the people come out into the streets in the hundreds of thousands. First they will show their teeth, then they will back down. Victory is assured.

The regime does not have the crackdown option. They will try to scare the people. And if they fail, they are going to back down. Or they are going to get washed away.

After the 1990 movement concluded, those who were guilty of illegal crackdowns on peaceful demonstrators were let go scot free. That was a big mistake. That mistake left room for the regression the country is facing right now. That mistake should not be repeated.

All acts of repression have to be documented. The guilty are to be punished once the interim democratic government gets hold of power.

In The News

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Gagan Thapa October 22 Saturday 2 PM Columbia University



Alliance for Democracy and Human Rights in Nepal, USA
Proudly Announces

“Bichaar Bimarsha”
A periodic socio-political discussions on Nepal

Co-Sponsors:

Human Rights Working Group, CIPA, Columbia University
South Asian Institute, CIPA, Columbia University

Struggle for Democracy in Nepal
Roles and Challenges of Youth

Interaction with Gagan Thapa

Former General Secretary of Nepal Student Union, student wing of Nepali Congress, the largest political party in Nepal, Gagan Thapa is undoubtedly the most prominent student leader who has become one of the leading figures in the current struggle for democracy in Nepal. He was jailed a number of times by King Gyanendra’s government after the royal takeover of February 1st, 2005 on charges of “sedition against the state,” for his outspoken stance against the King’s regime. The Amnesty International had considered him a prisoner of conscience, as he had been detained for his peaceful and legitimate activities in support of democracy and human rights in Nepal. He was released each time only under tremendous pressure from human rights organizations and international governments.

*Mr. Thapa’s presentation will be in Nepali. Written English transcripts of his major points will be available for non-Nepali audience.

** Q & A session will be held in English, with a translation help from the moderator if needed.

Venue:

Columbia University, W. 116th Street and Broadway.

Prentis Hall
632 West 125th Street
Room # 312 (Third Floor)
Columbia Uniiversity
New York, NY 10027.
Subway:

# 1 or # 9 to 116th Street Station.

Time: 2:00 pm

Date: Saturday, October 22nd, 2005.

Admission: Free

Questions? Call Anil: 917-670-1057 or, Sanjaya: 917-902-2667

Gagan Thapa October 22 Saturday 2 PM Columbia University
A Day In The Life Of Charlie Szrom
Gagan Thapa Talk In Boston: Two Hours Audio
Anil Jha, Bimal Nidhi, Jimmy Carter
Timi Sadak Ma Utreko Dekheko Chhu
Anil Jha, Bimal Nidhi US Tour Logistics
Bimalendra Nidhi US Tour
Gagan Thapa US Tour
September 16 Protest Rally
Sharad Chandra Shaha Is A Dazzling Person
Bharat Mohan Adhikari Is In Town
King Cancels UN Visit
Opposition To The Idea Of Meeting With The King
Anatomy Of The Conflict In Pokhara
Girijaspeak: When Republicans Are Royalists
5 Steps To Democracy
Renaming The Blog In Honor Of Gagan's Release
Gagan Thapa Released
Chargesheeting Gagan: This Regime Has Gone Berserk

Bill Clinton Had Icecream For Lunch
Bill Clinton Has Left The Building
Jesse Jackson On Martin Luther King Boulevard
The Saudi Royal Family Has Got To Go
I Am Running For Dean 2008 Campaign Chair
Soaking In Howard Dean
Dean Was In Town Yesterday

Monday, October 17, 2005

A Day In The Life Of Charlie Szrom



If I had met Robert Mayer (Publius Pundit) this past weekend, and it almost happened, and I met up with Charlie Szrom yesterday, and I will be seeing Gagan Thapa this coming weekend, that would have been three weekends in a row with some major student leaders. (Soaking In Howard Dean)

So I got to see Charlie. He flew in from Bloomington, Indiana, for a scholarship interview with some kind of a Polish American foundation. Looks like you get a thousand bucks for saying you take pride in your Polish heritage.

First we were to meet around 10 in the morning, then maybe around 11:30, when I showed up at the southern tip of Central Park. And I got a call from him. Can meet around 4:30 PM. So I got a few hours to stroll all over Central Park, and I also ventured north into Harlem. I watched some soccer at a Hispanic pizza establishment there.

And then there was this text message from Charlie. He was running a little late.

But then we met, and he said he had to catch a bus at the Grand Central Terminal by 8 PM. And so we had a few hours. We went to Ground Zero first. And then after we walked the unimpressive Wall Street walk - it is but a little pavement - I thought I was taking him to see the Statue Of Liberty.

"Is that not the Brooklyn Bridge?" Charlie asks.

"No," I said. And I pulled out my left hand, and made my palm the shape of Manhattan. I was trying to explain to him how we had walked to the other side of the southern tip. Considering this was Charlie's first time in New York City.

But he was right. It was the Brooklyn Bridge. Considering I live in Brooklyn. But Charlie did not hold it against me.

Then we crossed the Manhattan landmass again, and got to see the Statue, all the time talking. I was trying to emphasize upon Charlie that the moral support he and his organization, the Students For Global Democracy, had been extending to the movement in Nepal, and the simple fact that he was part of the conversation, was itself a major help to the movement in Nepal. He was already being helpful in a major way.

After the Statue, we headed north. The idea was to cross into Central Park, walk down to Times Square, and then walk over to the Grand Central. But we were running late. We skipped Central Park: it was kind of dark too by then. But he got a glimpse of the Upper East Side. And he took the train shuttle from Times Square to the Grand Central.

The train ride back home for me was confusing. They do all this construction work during weekends, and trains don't go where they are supposed to go. Routes not on the subway map get revealed. It has got to be mysterious down there.

Charlie can be hilarious sometimes. Like there was this story he told me about the movement in Ukraine last year. There were people who thought there was some sort of conspiracy going on, all these people out in the streets, out of the blue.

"No. They just wanted democracy," he related.

Charlie has interned at the National Endowment For Democracy. Considering how committed we both are to a global spread of democracy, I can so totally see us meeting again and again down the line.

We sure will stay in touch.

40 Photos.

Charlie
Dear Charlie
Email To Charlie Szrom
Email From Charlie Szrom


Mary Joyce, Demologue

Friday, October 14, 2005

Art Of War, Art Of Peace


The Maoists waged a decade long war. They started from scratch, from nothing, and they spread all over the country. They have lost thousands of cadres. The whole thing could not have been easy. There was a time when it was thought they will not attack the state army, that would be too much for them. But they managed to bring the RNA to a military stalemate.

That was the art of war.

Used to be the Maoists were for a communist republic. Now they have made an ideological transformation. They need to make that official.

To: Dr. Baburam Bhattarai

They need to formalize that ideological transformation.

They have proved themselves at the art of war. The unilateral ceasefire was their most brilliant military move ever. It was so brilliant the king was pushed to an unimagined global isolation.

Now the challenge for the Maoists is if they can prove themselves equally deft at peace.

Would they consider a unilateral disarmament in exchange for a common minimum program of a Democratic Republic by the seven parties?

These could be the steps.
  1. The Maoists tell the seven parties they will take the next step beyond the unilateral ceasefire. They will unilaterally disarm in exchange for a joint alliance.
  2. Then a formal eight party alliance will be formed. It will formally elect a leader.
  3. It will chalk out a program. A democratic republic would be at the core. I have suggested a 10 point program: Alliance Of Steel. I believe you need something as comprehensive to really get the masses riled up.
  4. Then you put forth joint protest programs. Parties do not put out separate programs.
As long as the seven party alliance would be willing to agree to 2,3 and 4, the Maoists should be able to do 1.

Think about it. The Maoists are going to disarm anyways. The whole idea of seeking UN mediation is to suggest they will disarm. So if you are willing to do it anyways, and if the UN option is not forthcoming, thanks to the king, why will you not do it on your own and speed things up? You are republicans, why do you so insist on the king having veto power?

And forget integrating the two armies. Fight for 27 million Nepalis, not 10,000 armed cadres. Liberation of 27 million people is more important than job security of 10,000 of your armed cadres. Let them all put down their weapons, and dedicate themselves to a peaceful achievement of a democratic republic. Especially now when the peaceful option is more effective.

If laying down your arms means a democratic republic will be achieved faster, why will you insist on keeping the arms and slowing things down? Speed things up. Lay down your arms permanently.

Instead of slowing things down, bargain hard with the parties on points 1,2,3,4.

Make them come around to 2,3 and 4 first. Then you come around to 1.

How can the parties trust you did 1? Invite them to monitor it. Invite the civil society to monitor it.

There is immense time pressure. If this regime is still in power on February 8, the seven party alliance and the Maoists are going to be locked in tough corners.

And send Girija this way. I will take him on a tour of 50 states myself. For five months.

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Badri Mandal: Winner


The King's February 2006, April 2007 Offensive

The seven party alliance will not be an alliance.

It will not do what it takes to launch a revolution.

It will not do what it takes to launch a movement.

Which leaves room for a negotiated settlement. But that asks for dialogue.

But if the Monarchists act unreasonable, forging an alliance with the Maoists is an option. But that also asks for dialogue.

Dialogue is political work.

The Maoists will not do what it takes to for forge a strong alliance with the democrats.

They continue to think of another military offensive as an option. And if they prepare for that, that weakens the possibilities of an alliance with the democrats. And if they can not forge an alliance with the democrats, what are their chances for a soft landing?

So the Maoist-democrat alliance is nowhere close to gelling.

The seven party alliance is in disarray.

Girija's House revival stance is the litmus test. As long as he still holds that position, the seven party alliance will continue to be in disarray.

The February 2006 elections for the towns and cities that the king has announced, and the April 2007 parliamentary polls. That is a political challege to the seven parties, and a military challenge to the Maoists.

Hopefully the Maoists have weakened. But if they have not, and there is no telling, and even if they make bungled attempts at disruption, that will still be bloodshed that could have been avoided. And if there is bloodshed, there will be a new gap of trust between the Maoists and the democrats.

But the election announcements might gradually erode some of the international support for the democrats. They have wasted too much time so far this year. They let months pass.

Especially if international observers are allowed - first they said they will be allowed, then Tulsi Giri came out saying they will not be allowed - then the parties are going to come under additional pressure.

And Girija is going to keep parroting the House revival mantra.

And Badri Mandal's Sadbhavana and Pashupati Rana's RPP are going to contest elections. And they are going to win 30 mayoral seats each roughly.

Gajendra Narayan Singh could not have seen this coming.

Considering the parties have been allowed to function more or less at normal, there is no outright persecution, the parties will face additional pressure.

All because there is this refusal to do political homework.

Genius Girija.

If the king could revive the House, that would make null and void the Prime Minister's prerogative to dissolve the House. That would go against the norms of a parliamentary democracy.

The democrats were trapped between the Monarchists and the Maoists, now they are trapped between February 2006 and April 2007 also.

Does the seven party alliance ever hold meetings?

Needed: a goal and an action plan.

Or maybe there is an Article 127 in the Nepali Congress constitution that we could use to revive the House, and Girija would be happy, and the rest of us could move on.

The King's February 2006, April 2007 Offensive


The king has gone on the offensive.

Muncipal polls in February 2006, and parliamentary polls in April 2007.

He is seizing the initiative.

The seven party alliance is in disarray. The UML is going ahead with its own programs. Amik Sherchan's People's Front is doing the same. Girija's idiotic House revival stance is pushing the seven party alliance to a breaking point.

The seven party alliance should be holding joint programs. And if they are not, that shows they are refusing to come together and agree on a common platform.

If you can not even come together for democracy, what can you come together for?

Reagan claimed he increased the defense expenditures so much, the Soviet Union imploded. It is possible the king might say that about the Maoists. And take credit for it.

On the other hand, what if the Maoists call the king's bluff? They have already vowed to actively disrupt the polls.

If democracy is about elections, as it is, why will the king instead not opt for elections to a constituent assembly? That will end the civil war.

The seven party alliance has the option to get together and:
  • Formally elect a leader.
  • Create a five or a ten point political platform.
  • Launch joint nationwide protest programs.
Or forget the idea that you will bring hundreds of thousands out into the streets.

But so far they have been unwilling to come around to it. Beats me. The king has a clear action plan. The seven party alliance does not. Even the Maoists have more clarity.

JFK made that point in his college thesis: Why England Slept?

That democracies are less prone to respond well to an impending threat like the Nazis were.

The seven party alliance is making no attempts at clarity. They are still trying to "convince" the king to revive the House. They are banging their head against the wall.

In The News

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Crackdown On Media Is Crackdown On People


"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We wouldn't let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas?" -- Josef Stalin

If anyone needed evidence this king lacks a democratic character, now he has tightened the screw on the media. This step takes confrontation to a whole new level. Tulsi Giri was right, it really is a choice between monarchy and democracy. I know where I stand. This step asks for underground pamphleteerig to bring down the monarchy itself.


Movement time is over. Now it is revolution time.

You don't hold dialogue with this regime. It is now a fight to the finish.

The king has invited a polarization that leads to an end of the monarchy.

The seven party alliance now needs to formally adopt Democratic Republic as its common slogan.

King promulgates media ordinance NepalNews .... In the new laws the authorities have been authorised to slap heavy amount of fine to publishers and editors if the published materials are found to be “helpful to terrorists”. The ordinance has also incorporated stricter provisions regarding publication or broadcasting of materials likely to create communal or religious disharmony...... According to The Kathmandu Post, there are provisions in the new ordinance to increase the penalty to editors and publishers - for publishing defamatory items - up to Rs.100,000 from Rs.10,000 while anyone publishing, translating or importing banned items will be subjected to a penalty of Rs.500,000.......

United We Blog is down. Looks like the media crackdown is already having major effects in terms of self-censorship.
In The News
  • What type of democracy do Koirala, Nepal want? Gorkhapatra
  • Poll announcement in Nepal may trigger fresh violence NewKerala.com .... "only a constituent assembly election can address these issues. Holding local elections instead is like putting medicine on your belly button when you have a headache." ....Ram Chandra Poudel: "When the country is in a political crisis, it is meaningless to hold municipal polls without resolving it first. If the government wants to hold polls, they should hold elections to parliament and a constituent assembly." ...... Rashtriya Prajatantra Party, said while it was committed to participating in the polls, it wanted the government to create a conducive atmosphere for major parliamentary parties to participate in them...... Surya Bahadur Thapa said his newly formed Rastriya Janashakti Party was still considering its participation. "Elections are meant for the parties," Thapa told IANS. "If they stay away, there is no point of holding polls."
  • Madhav Nepal Reiterates Poll-boycott Stance Himalayan Times, Nepal
  • Parties promise peaceful putsch after festivals Kathmandu Post ..... prepare for a firebrand action after Dashain and Tihar ..... planning to field hundreds of thousands of people on the streets and complete the peaceful putsch. Senior leaders of Nepali Congress, CPN-UML, and People's Front Nepal claimed that the post-festival movement would be decisive...... the NC will launch its nationwide awareness campaign immediately after Dashain. They will make aware people on a whole gamut of issues ranging from constituent assembly, role of political parties in democracy and the king's retrogressive activities...... party will deploy its central-level leaders in all 75 districts and they will sensitize people about the king's regression, revitalize party organization, and go strongly for pro-democracy movement..... campaign would monitor the Maoists' unilateral ceasefire. "It will be a test case for us to know whether the Maoists will really allow political parties to carry out their activities in local level" ...... CPN-UML, another large party in the seven-party alliance, has already launched a nationwide "Loktantra Awareness Campaign" for the next two months...... party has already deployed its central level leaders in all 75 districts for the campaign. "The party has set local level programs like meetings, interactions, and wall-paintings to sensitize people about democratic republicanism" ...... UML has already announced its nationwide protest programs on November 11, immediately after Tihar. Similarly the party has also called its nationwide cadres' gathering in Kathmandu on 14-15 November..... Amik Sherchan, chairman of Peoples' Front Nepal (PFN), said that his party had set a two-and-a-half month long awareness campaign at local levels.
  • Polls will increase confrontation: Nepal ....the seven-party alliance is holding an informal negotiation with the Maoists. "But the Maoists should first make their position clear about multi-party democratic system, human rights and peoples' sovereignty," he said. "I think the Maoists are now holding their internal meeting regarding these issues and the formal talk will take place after they come out with a decision" .... the parties were expecting harsher moves in the days to come. "New constitution may be introduced, political parties and unions could be banned," he said, adding, "But we are undeterred in our mission and will continue with our movement until democracy and peoples' sovereignty is restored." ..... "Autocratic governments always attack free press because it is the real voice of the people," Nepal said. "It is a clear example of the government's autocratic attitude" .... "If you keep quiet, autocrats throttle down, but once you protest, they withdraw"
  • Polls will only complicate problems: Parties

Sunday, October 09, 2005

The King Has Gone On The Offensive



Muncipal polls were to be in April. Now he says February. So the democrats have at best three months to get hundreds of thousands of people out into the streets, possibly less. If it is January already, and you still are only getting a thousand people here, a thousand people there, then you are going to come under some international pressure.

Tulsi Giri has said no to international observers, so this gang seems set on their program of what they might call guided democracy.

Municipal polls conducted by an illegitimate, unconstitutional regime, without international observers, with no political party participation, with the Maoists still lurking in the wings, possibly plotting to mess up the polls: it does not look all good.

My dear fellow democrats are refusing to do basic political homework. Girija is the number one villain. Either he should let go the ridiculous House revival idea, or he should go ahead and participate in the king's municipal polls. Those are the only two options he has.

Say if the king does not do what Girija wants him to do, and there is a violent overthrow of the monarchy, then do you think that revolution will revive the House? That is a laughable scenario.
I can not trust Girija unless he lets the House revival idea sink.

The biggest reason the common people are not coming out into the streets in large numbers is because of this idiotic House revival idea. The people are not for the king's autocracy, but they also do not like the idea of the 1990s democracy, sham, half-hearted democracy. The House revival idea is like going back to the 1990s. The people do not want to go back. They want to go forward.

You let go the House revival idea. That is step one. Unless that is done, nothing else is possible.

Girija is Tulsi Giri's best friend. Tulsi Giri could not stop a mass movement even if he wanted to. But Girija single handedly is in the way of a mass movement.

You get rid of the House revival idea. Then the seven of you sit down, and elect a formal leader for the movement. And you also come up with a political program.

The leader has to be formally elected by the seven members, preferably by consensus. That election has never taken place. You can not have a movement without a leader.

The Bahun democrats will not look at the 10-point program I have suggested because I talk of federalism there. And they also don't like the idea of putting their family property statements online.

Face it, there was some major corruption in the 1990s, maybe not as bad as the royal corruption, and the army corruption of today, but there was some major corruption. And the people do not want a repeat of that. And you are going to deliver, or you are going to disappear.

What do these democrats do all day? I wonder.

They will not take a look at my 10-point program. (Alliance Of Steel)

They will not take a look at my Proposed Constitution. You could look at my document and finish the job within weeks (Wish Me Luck) or you could drone through the process for six years like in South Africa. Save time, take a look at my proposal. The Bahuns will not because that might lead to federalism!

The king just went on the offensive. Now you are under some added time pressure.

He says February 8.

The challenge for us is can we make that the deadline for an end to this regime? Can we kick this regime out by February 8? That is the question facing us.

But so far the dishonest Bahuns show no signs of budging. They would rather go down than give in on issues of social justice.

There is a refusal to think through things. There is a refusal to think through the endgame. There is a refusal to think through scenarios.

Girija is in no hurry. He has declared this is to be the final struggle of his life. So if he is 83, and he is to live to be 93 or 103, are we in for a hundred years' war? Makes you think.

Finish it off. Give yourself three months, and finish this movement off. The real challenge should not have to be democracy, the real challenge has to be the economic growth challenge after democracy.

And Girija is in the way.

In The News

The Maoists Need To Come Clean Or They Go Down With The King


The Hardliner Democrat Approach
The Bombing Of A Bus

The Maoists are not capable of militarily taking over the country. They never will be. And even if they were, they will not be able to sustain a regime for long. Communist republic is too archaic an idea to stick.

The myth that the king and the Maoists are stronger than the democrats is fast running out of the news cycle.

I am seriously disturbed by the INSEC report (Homework For Another Round Of Civil War) that the Maoists have abducted over 8,000 students and teachers since they declared the ceasefire.

This royal regime is on its last legs. It has only a few months left.

Why would the Maoists declare a ceasefire and not mean it?

One, they honestly declared a ceasefire, but it was not reciprocated so they had to start preparing for another round of fights. That does not hold water. You declared a ceasefire to forge a strong alliance with the democrats to seek a common minimum program of a democratic republic. The king is not part of the equation.

Two, don't blame them. If the RNA is going to come after them, they need to prepare for another round of fights. That does not hold water. There will not be another round of fights. The democrats are on their way to kicking the king out.

Three, they mean to deceive the democrats. They want to use the democrats against the king, and then crush the democrats. That would be like digging their graves. The democrats are going to take over power. That power can not be displaced with a ragtag army of 10,000 armed cadres. 10,000 armed hooligans are not going to take over 27 million freedom loving Nepalis, are not going to rule over them.

The reason the Maoists need to honestly stick to the ceasefire is because now is the time for a decisive movement. This regime has only a few months left. And a ceasefire has to be a total ceasefire. No armed action, no abductions, no extortions. Anything less is not a ceasefire.

But if the Maoist talk of a constituent assembly and a democratic republic is a sham, the democrats will march on to victory on their own, and then push the Maoists into irrelevance by eating their political and social lunch, giving mass amnesty to most of the Maoist cadres, and conducting decisive surgical operations against the leadership with the sole intention of sending them to a country tribunal. Maoists hiding in India would be hounded with Indian help.

The Maoists do not have the option to play hide and seek. They can not talk democratic republic and mean communist republic. They fool noone.

So have they or have they not abducted over 8,000 people recently? That is not a RNA claim that they have.

Another round of civil war is not an option. If the Maoists engage in another round of civil war, they stand to permanently close doors on possibilities of any alliance with the democrats and any hopes of a soft landing.

The offer of a soft landing from the democrats has not been the voice of weakness and should not be understood as such.

Or if they mean to stick to a communist republic, they should say so. On the other hand, if they mean a democratic republic, they should stick to it.

And if they stick to the communist republic mantra, I challenge them to an open ideological debate on the topic. If you are Marxist scientists, you should open yourself up to analysis. Let's debate.

Another round of civil war will seriously hamper the movement. And the democrats do not have to take it lying down.

It is very possible for the democrats to get rid of the king, and then get rid of the Maoists. The two guns are vastly overestimating their reach.

Or the two came together, they go down together.

The Maoists are not indispensable to the success of the democracy movement.

The Maoists need to come clean.

Are they serious about their ideological transformation, or Baburam Bhattarai and Prachanda do not both talk for the same party, what is it? Are they serious about a constituent assembly? A democratic republic?

If they are serious, preparing for another round of civil war is the worst possible thing they could do at this jucture of the movement.

The democrats could steal the Maoist political and social thunder like the king never could. And beyond that they will be reduced to being a law and order problem.

They will burn out. Their organization would implode.

That or the Maoists could cooperate with the democrats and hope to become one of the larger parties in a democratic Nepal. If they launch another round of the civil war, they shut doors forever.

You don't punish the democrats for mistakes made by the king. If you do, the democrats do not have to take it lying down.